Literature DB >> 11046213

Sex differences in morphine analgesia: an experimental study in healthy volunteers.

E Sarton1, E Olofsen, R Romberg, J den Hartigh, B Kest, D Nieuwenhuijs, A Burm, L Teppema, A Dahan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal and human studies indicate the existence of important sex-related differences in opioid-mediated behavior. In this study the authors examined the influence of morphine on experimentally induced pain in healthy male and female volunteers.
METHODS: Young healthy men and women (10 of each sex) received intravenous morphine (bolus 0.1-mg/kg dose followed by an infusion of 0.030 mg. kg-1. h-1 for 1 h). Pain threshold and pain tolerance in response to a gradual increase in transcutaneous electrical stimulation, as well as plasma concentrations of morphine and its major metabolites (morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide) were determined at regular intervals up to 7 h after the start of morphine infusion. A population pharmacodynamic model was used to analyze the morphine-induced changes in stimulus intensity. The improvement of the model fits by inclusion of covariates (sex, age, weight, lean body mass) was tested for significance. The model is characterized by baseline current, a rate constant for equilibrium between plasma and effect-site morphine concentrations (ke0), and analgesic potency (AC50, or the morphine concentration causing a 100% increase in stimulus intensity for response).
RESULTS: The inclusion of the covariates age, weight, and lean body mass did not improve the model fits for any of the model parameters. For both pain threshold and tolerance, a significant dependency on sex was observed for the parameters ke0 (pain threshold: 0.0070 +/- 0.0013 (+/- SE) min-1 in men vs. 0.0030 +/- 0. 0005 min-1 in women; pain tolerance: 0.0073 +/- 0.0012 min-1 in men vs. 0.0024 +/- 0.0005 min-1 in women) and AC50 (pain threshold: 71.2 +/- 10.5 nm in men vs. 41.7 +/- 8.4 nm in women; pain tolerance: 76. 5 +/- 7.4 nm in men vs. 32.9 +/- 7.9 nm in women). Baseline currents were similar for both sexes: 21.4 +/- 1.6 mA for pain threshold and 39.1 +/- 2.3 mA for pain tolerance. Concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide did not differ between men and women.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show sex differences in morphine analgesia, with greater morphine potency but slower speed of onset and offset in women. The data are in agreement with observations of sex differences in morphine-induced respiratory depression and may explain higher postoperative opioid consumption in men relative to women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11046213     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200011000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  82 in total

1.  Contribution of GIRK2-mediated postsynaptic signaling to opiate and alpha 2-adrenergic analgesia and analgesic sex differences.

Authors:  Igor Mitrovic; Marta Margeta-Mitrovic; Semon Bader; Markus Stoffel; Lily Y Jan; Allan I Basbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of anesthetics.

Authors:  Erik Olofsen; Albert Dahan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Differences in the prevalence and severity of side effects based on type of analgesic prescription in patients with chronic cancer pain.

Authors:  Patrice Villars; Marylin Dodd; Claudia West; Theresa Koetters; Steven M Paul; Karen Schumacher; Debu Tripathy; Peter Koo; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Blood-brain distribution of morphine-6-glucuronide in sheep.

Authors:  H H Villesen; D J R Foster; R N Upton; L L Christrup; A A Somogyi; A Martinez; C Grant
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Sex, gender, and pain: an overview of a complex field.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in anaesthesia.

Authors:  Pedro L Gambús; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  The impact of sex as a biological variable in the search for novel antidepressants.

Authors:  Alexia V Williams; Brian C Trainor
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 8.606

8.  Buprenorphine Depresses Respiratory Variability in Obese Mice with Altered Leptin Signaling.

Authors:  Chelsea Angel; Zachary T Glovak; Wateen Alami; Sara Mihalko; Josh Price; Yandong Jiang; Helen A Baghdoyan; Ralph Lydic
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Premedication with tramadol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Laurino Grossi; Giorgio Cappello; Leonardo Marzio
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Can coadministration of oxycodone and morphine produce analgesic synergy in humans? An experimental cold pain study.

Authors:  Michael Grach; Wattan Massalha; Dorit Pud; Rivka Adler; Elon Eisenberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.