Literature DB >> 17766187

Recognizing osteoporosis and its consequences in Quebec (ROCQ): background, rationale, and methods of an anti-fracture patient health-management programme.

Louis Bessette1, Louis-Georges Ste-Marie, Sonia Jean, K Shawn Davison, Michèle Beaulieu, Mirela Baranci, Jennifer Bessant, Jacques P Brown.   

Abstract

Recognizing Osteoporosis and its Consequences in Quebec (ROCQ) is an ongoing patient health-management programme aimed at evaluating the diagnostic and treatment care gaps for osteoporosis following a fragility fracture, and subsequently initiating and measuring interventions to decrease these gaps in women 50 years of age and over. Hospitals servicing approximately half of the population of the Province of Quebec (Canada) are participating in the ROCQ programme. Women with fragility and traumatic fractures are approached during their visit to a cast or outpatient clinic and are subsequently contacted by telephone 0 to 16 weeks after their fracture (phase 1). During the first phone contact, they are invited to answer a questionnaire aimed at identifying the specific circumstances of their fracture and asked to participate in an observational study that could last up to 18 months. Based on this initial questionnaire, patients are classified as having either experienced a fragility or traumatic fracture. During the first phone contact, there is no reference about the possible association between the fracture and osteoporosis and no investigation or intervention is proposed. Six to eight months after the fracture event (phase 2), women are again contacted by phone to complete a questionnaire that evaluates the diagnostic and treatment rates for osteoporosis. At this phase of the programme, women with fragility fractures are randomized to one of the three following intervention groups: 1) Educational Video Group, 2) Documentation Group and 3) Control Group. Participants are contacted 12 to 14 months after the intervention (phase 3) to evaluate the efficacy of the interventions on the diagnosis and treatment rates of osteoporosis. All participants with fragility or traumatic fractures who consent will be followed for 20 years using data from the Québec Ministry of Health database to measure the association between the index fracture and future fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17766187     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  20 in total

1.  The current economic burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada.

Authors:  R B Hopkins; N Burke; C Von Keyserlingk; W D Leslie; S N Morin; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou; L Bessette; J P Brown; L Pericleous; J Tarride
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  D Marsh; K Akesson; D E Beaton; E R Bogoch; S Boonen; M-L Brandi; A R McLellan; P J Mitchell; J E M Sale; D A Wahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Osteoporosis-Related Health Behaviors in Men With Prostate Cancer and Survivors: Exploring Osteoporosis Knowledge, Health Beliefs, and Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Annie-Claude M Lassemillante; Tina L Skinner; John D Hooper; John B Prins; Olivia R L Wright
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 4.  Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  J E M Sale; D Beaton; J Posen; V Elliot-Gibson; E Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L Bessette; K S Davison; S Jean; S Roy; L G Ste-Marie; J P Brown
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Patients' response toward an automated orthopedic osteoporosis intervention program.

Authors:  Matthew A Varacallo; Edward J Fox; Emmanuel M Paul; Susan E Hassenbein; Pamela M Warlow
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

7.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Little; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Lora M Giangregorio; Norma J Macintyre; Lehana Thabane; Carly J Skidmore; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

Review 9.  Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Simon D French; Sally Green; Rachelle Buchbinder; Hayley Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

10.  The impact of educational interventions on modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis after a fragility fracture.

Authors:  C Beaudoin; L Bessette; S Jean; L-G Ste-Marie; J P Brown
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.