Literature DB >> 17764772

Temporal coordination between actions and sound during sequence production.

Peter Q Pfordresher1, Brian Benitez.   

Abstract

Delayed auditory feedback (DAF) causes asynchronies between perception and action that disrupt sequence production. Different delay lengths cause differing amounts of disruption that may reflect the phase location of feedback onsets relative to produced inter-response intervals, or the absolute temporal separation between actions and sounds. Two experiments addressed this issue by comparing the effects of traditional DAF, which uses a constant temporal separation, with delays that adjust temporal separation to maintain the phase location of feedback onsets within inter-response intervals. Participants played simple isochronous melodies on a keyboard, or tapped an isochronous beat, at three production rates. Disruption was best predicted by the phase location of feedback onsets, and diminished when feedback onsets formed harmonic phase ratios (phase synchrony). Both delay types led to similar effects. Different movement tasks (melody production versus tapping) led to slightly different patterns of disruption across phase that may relate to differing task demands. In general, these results support the view that perception and action are coordinated in relative rather than absolute time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17764772     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  10 in total

1.  Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes during piano playing.

Authors:  Shinichi Furuya; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Schultz MIDI Benchmarking Toolbox for MIDI interfaces, percussion pads, and sound cards.

Authors:  Benjamin G Schultz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-02

3.  The role of feedback in the production of skilled finger sequences.

Authors:  Nicola J Popp; Carlos R Hernandez-Castillo; Paul L Gribble; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback on speech kinematics in fluent speakers.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2012-12

5.  The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production.

Authors:  Jennifer Chesters; Ladan Baghai-Ravary; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal recalibration in vocalization induced by adaptation of delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kosuke Yamamoto; Hideaki Kawabata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of delayed visual feedback on grooved pegboard test performance.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-08

8.  The effect of delayed auditory feedback on activity in the temporal lobe while speaking: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Hideki Takaso; Frank Eisner; Richard Js Wise; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Error monitoring in musicians.

Authors:  Clemens Maidhof
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Auditory dominance in motor-sensory temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.