Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Measuring performance quality in general practice: is international harmonization desirable?

Literature DB >> 17761054

Measuring performance quality in general practice: is international harmonization desirable?

Richard Grol, Michel Wensing.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2007 PMID： 17761054 PMCID： PMC2151781

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Gen Pract ISSN： 0960-1643 Impact factor: 5.386

× No keyword cloud information.

15 in total

Review 1. Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care.

Authors: Michel Wensing; Glyn Elwyn
Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-04-19

2. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors: S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M Marshall
Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2002-12

Review 3. Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Authors: Matthew Hankins; Alice Fraser; Andrew Hodson; Claire Hooley; Helen Smith
Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4. The ethics of attribution: the case of health care outcome indicators.

Authors: E Russell
Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 4.634

5. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.

Authors: R Grol; M Wensing; J Mainz; H P Jung; P Ferreira; H Hearnshaw; P Hjortdahl; F Olesen; S Reis; M Ribacke; J Szecsenyi
Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.386

6. Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison.

Authors: Michel Wensing; Peter Vedsted; Janko Kersnik; Wim Peersman; Anja Klingenberg; Hilary Hearnshaw; Per Hjortdahl; Dominique Paulus; Beat Künzi; Juan Mendive; Richard Grol
Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.038

7. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).

Authors: R Grol; M Wensing; J Mainz; P Ferreira; H Hearnshaw; P Hjortdahl; F Olesen; M Ribacke; T Spenser; J Szécsényi
Journal: Fam Pract Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 2.267

3. Decreasing trends in patient satisfaction, accessibility and continuity of care in Finnish primary health care - a 14-year follow-up questionnaire study.

Authors: Risto Raivio; Juhani Jääskeläinen; Doris Holmberg-Marttila; Kari J Mattila
Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 2.497

3 in total

Measuring performance quality in general practice: is international harmonization desirable?

Review 1. Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care.

2. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Review 3. Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Review 4. The ethics of attribution: the case of health care outcome indicators.

5. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.

6. Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison.

7. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).

Review 8. Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review.

9. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

10. Impact of national health care systems on patient evaluations of general practice in Europe.

1. Diabetes care: reasons for missing HbA1c measurements in general practice.

2. Patients' assessments of the continuity of primary care in Finland: a 15-year follow-up questionnaire survey.

3. Decreasing trends in patient satisfaction, accessibility and continuity of care in Finnish primary health care - a 14-year follow-up questionnaire study.