Literature DB >> 10321388

Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).

R Grol1, M Wensing, J Mainz, P Ferreira, H Hearnshaw, P Hjortdahl, F Olesen, M Ribacke, T Spenser, J Szécsényi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Improving the sensitivity of general practice to patients' needs demands a good understanding of patients' expectations and priorities in care provision. Insight into differences in expectations of patients in different cultures and health care systems may support decision-making on desirable models for care provision in general practice. An international study was conducted to determine priorities of patients in general practice care: which views do patients in different countries have in common and which views differ?
METHODS: Written surveys in general practices in the UK, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands, Germany, Portugal and Israel were performed. Samples of patients from at least 12 practices per country, stratified according to area and type of practice, were included. Patients rated the importance of 38 different aspects of general practice care, selected on the basis of literature analysis, qualitative studies and consensus discussions. Rankings between countries were compared.
RESULTS: A total number of 3540 patients (response rate on average 55%) completed the questionnaire. Patients in different countries had many opinions in common. Aspects that got the highest ranking were: getting enough time during the consultation; quick services in case of emergencies; confidentiality of information on patients; telling patients all they want to know about their illness; making patients feel free to talk about their problems; GPs going to courses regularly; and offering preventive services. However, differences between opinions of patients in different countries were also found for some of the selected aspects. A confounding effect of patients' characteristics may have played a role in these differences. DISCUSSION: The study provides information on what patients expect of and value in general practice care. It shows that patients in different cultures and health care systems may have different views on some aspects of care, but most of all that they have many views in common, particularly as far as doctor-patient communication and accessibility of services are concerned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10321388     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  70 in total

Review 1.  Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care.

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-19

2.  Views of patients and general dental practitioners on the organizational aspects of a general dental practice.

Authors:  Rutger Sonneveld; Wolter Brands; Ewald Bronkhorst; Gert-Jan Truin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care.

Authors:  H P Jung; M Wensing; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

4.  Exploring the safety measures by doctors on after-hours house call services.

Authors:  Chris Ifediora
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2015-07-31

5.  The effects of a team-based continuous quality improvement intervention on the management of primary care: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yvonne Engels; Pieter van den Hombergh; Henk Mokkink; Henk van den Hoogen; Wil van den Bosch; Richard Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Measuring performance quality in general practice: is international harmonization desirable?

Authors:  Richard Grol; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Adherence of patients to long-term medication: a cross-sectional study of antihypertensive regimens in Austria.

Authors:  Felix Lötsch; Lorenz Auer-Hackenberg; Mirjam Groger; Khalid Rehman; Valerie Morrison; Emily Holmes; Sahdia Parveen; Catrin Plumpton; Wendy Clyne; Sabina de Geest; Fabienne Dobbels; Bernard Vrijens; Przemyslaw Kardas; Dyfrig Hughes; Michael Ramharter
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Parents' preferences for enhanced access in the pediatric medical home: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Joseph S Zickafoose; Lisa R DeCamp; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Patient evaluations of accessibility and co-ordination in general practice in Europe.

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Jan Hermsen; Richard Grol; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  [Health care workers' expectations: what features of health centers do they value most? A qualitative and quantitative study].

Authors:  F Palacio Lapuente; R Marquet Palomar; A Oliver Esteve; P Castro Guardiola; M Bel Reverter; J L Piñol Moreso
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.