Literature DB >> 17737698

An experiment in earthquake control at rangely, colorado.

C B Raleigh, J H Healy, J D Bredehoeft.   

Abstract

An experiment in an oil field at Rangely, Colorado, has demonstrated the feasibility of earthquake control. Variations in seismicity were produced by controlled variations in the fluid pressure in a seismically active zone. Precise earthquake locations revealed that the earthquakes clustered about a fault trending through a zone of high pore pressure produced by secondary recovery operations. Laboratory measurements of the frictional properties of the reservoir rocks and an in situ stress measurement made near the earthquake zone were used to predict the fluid pressure required to trigger earthquakes on preexisting fractures. Fluid pressure was controlled by alternately injecting and recovering water from wells that penetrated the seismic zone. Fluid pressure was monitored in observation wells, and a computer model of the reservoir was used to infer the fluid pressure distributions in the vicinity of the injection wells. The results of this experiment confirm the predicted effect of fluid pressure on earthquake activity and indicate that earthquakes can be controlled wherever we can control the fluid pressure in a fault zone.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 17737698     DOI: 10.1126/science.191.4233.1230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  20 in total

1.  Geologic carbon storage is unlikely to trigger large earthquakes and reactivate faults through which CO2 could leak.

Authors:  Victor Vilarrasa; Jesus Carrera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Artificial quakes shake Oklahoma.

Authors:  Alexandra Witze
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Faults and associated karst collapse suggest conduits for fluid flow that influence hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity.

Authors:  Elwyn Galloway; Tyler Hauck; Hilary Corlett; Dinu Pană; Ryan Schultz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Mark D Zoback; Steven M Gorelick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Preventing Instabilities and Inducing Controlled, Slow-Slip in Frictionally Unstable Systems.

Authors:  Ioannis Stefanou; Georgios Tzortzopoulos
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.390

6.  Impact of Tohoku-Oki 3.11 M9.0 Earthquake on the Fault Slip Potential of the Active Quaternary Faults in Beijing City: New Insights from In Situ Stress Monitoring Data.

Authors:  Yulu Fan; Chengjun Feng; Peng Zhang; Bangshen Qi; Jing Meng; Chengxuan Tan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Julian J Bommer
Journal:  Bull Earthq Eng       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.556

8.  Anthropogenic triggering of large earthquakes.

Authors:  Francesco Mulargia; Andrea Bizzarri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A process-based approach to understanding and managing triggered seismicity.

Authors:  Bradford H Hager; James Dieterich; Cliff Frohlich; Ruben Juanes; Stefano Mantica; John H Shaw; Francesca Bottazzi; Federica Caresani; David Castineira; Alberto Cominelli; Marco Meda; Lorenzo Osculati; Stefania Petroselli; Andreas Plesch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Oklahoma's recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal.

Authors:  F Rall Walsh; Mark D Zoback
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.