Literature DB >> 35474945

Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty.

Julian J Bommer1.   

Abstract

The fundamental objective of earthquake engineering is to protect lives and livelihoods through the reduction of seismic risk. Directly or indirectly, this generally requires quantification of the risk, for which quantification of the seismic hazard is required as a basic input. Over the last several decades, the practice of seismic hazard analysis has evolved enormously, firstly with the introduction of a rational framework for handling the apparent randomness in earthquake processes, which also enabled risk assessments to consider both the severity and likelihood of earthquake effects. The next major evolutionary step was the identification of epistemic uncertainties related to incomplete knowledge, and the formulation of frameworks for both their quantification and their incorporation into hazard assessments. Despite these advances in the practice of seismic hazard analysis, it is not uncommon for the acceptance of seismic hazard estimates to be hindered by invalid comparisons, resistance to new information that challenges prevailing views, and attachment to previous estimates of the hazard. The challenge of achieving impartial acceptance of seismic hazard and risk estimates becomes even more acute in the case of earthquakes attributed to human activities. A more rational evaluation of seismic hazard and risk due to induced earthquakes may be facilitated by adopting, with appropriate adaptations, the advances in risk quantification and risk mitigation developed for natural seismicity. While such practices may provide an impartial starting point for decision making regarding risk mitigation measures, the most promising avenue to achieve broad societal acceptance of the risks associated with induced earthquakes is through effective regulation, which needs to be transparent, independent, and informed by risk considerations based on both sound seismological science and reliable earthquake engineering.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Earthquake hazards; Epistemic uncertainty; Induced seismicity; Seismic hazard analysis; Seismic risk; Seismic risk mitigation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35474945      PMCID: PMC9026070          DOI: 10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Earthq Eng        ISSN: 1570-761X            Impact factor:   4.556


  25 in total

1.  Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences.

Authors:  N Oreskes; K Shrader-Frechette; K Belitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Energy supplies. Peak oil production may already be here.

Authors:  Richard A Kerr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Fault activation by hydraulic fracturing in western Canada.

Authors:  Xuewei Bao; David W Eaton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Oklahoma's induced seismicity strongly linked to wastewater injection depth.

Authors:  Thea Hincks; Willy Aspinall; Roger Cooke; Thomas Gernon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  A risk-mitigation approach to the management of induced seismicity.

Authors:  Julian J Bommer; Helen Crowley; Rui Pinho
Journal:  J Seismol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.489

6.  Seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir driven by pore pressure diffusion and asperities loading.

Authors:  Simone Cesca; Daniel Stich; Francesco Grigoli; Alessandro Vuan; José Ángel López-Comino; Peter Niemz; Estefanía Blanch; Torsten Dahm; William L Ellsworth
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Characterisation of ground motion recording stations in the Groningen gas field.

Authors:  Rik Noorlandt; Pauline P Kruiver; Marco P E de Kleine; Marios Karaoulis; Ger de Lange; Antonio Di Matteo; Julius von Ketelhodt; Elmer Ruigrok; Benjamin Edwards; Adrian Rodriguez-Marek; Julian J Bommer; Jan van Elk; Dirk Doornhof
Journal:  J Seismol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 1.489

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.