Literature DB >> 34321668

A process-based approach to understanding and managing triggered seismicity.

Bradford H Hager1, James Dieterich2, Cliff Frohlich3, Ruben Juanes4,5, Stefano Mantica6, John H Shaw7, Francesca Bottazzi6, Federica Caresani6, David Castineira4, Alberto Cominelli6, Marco Meda6, Lorenzo Osculati6, Stefania Petroselli6, Andreas Plesch7.   

Abstract

There is growing concern about seismicity triggered by human activities, whereby small increases in stress bring tectonically loaded faults to failure. Examples of such activities include mining, impoundment of water, stimulation of geothermal fields, extraction of hydrocarbons and water, and the injection of water, CO2 and methane into subsurface reservoirs1. In the absence of sufficient information to understand and control the processes that trigger earthquakes, authorities have set up empirical regulatory monitoring-based frameworks with varying degrees of success2,3. Field experiments in the early 1970s at the Rangely, Colorado (USA) oil field4 suggested that seismicity might be turned on or off by cycling subsurface fluid pressure above or below a threshold. Here we report the development, testing and implementation of a multidisciplinary methodology for managing triggered seismicity using comprehensive and detailed information about the subsurface to calibrate geomechanical and earthquake source physics models. We then validate these models by comparing their predictions to subsequent observations made after calibration. We use our approach in the Val d'Agri oil field in seismically active southern Italy, demonstrating the successful management of triggered seismicity using a process-based method applied to a producing hydrocarbon field. Applying our approach elsewhere could help to manage and mitigate triggered seismicity.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34321668     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03668-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  8 in total

1.  Heightened odds of large earthquakes near istanbul: An interaction-based probability calculation

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The use of earthquake rate changes as a stress meter at Kilauea volcano.

Authors:  J Dieterich; V Cayol; P Okubo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu islands earthquake swarm that stressing rate governs seismicity.

Authors:  Shinji Toda; Ross S Stein; Takeshi Sagiya
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Earth tides can trigger shallow thrust fault earthquakes.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Cochran; John E Vidale; Sachiko Tanaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  An experiment in earthquake control at rangely, colorado.

Authors:  C B Raleigh; J H Healy; J D Bredehoeft
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Inversion of inherited thrusts by wastewater injection induced seismicity at the Val d'Agri oilfield (Italy).

Authors:  M Buttinelli; L Improta; S Bagh; C Chiarabba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Understanding rate effects in injection-induced earthquakes.

Authors:  Maryam Alghannam; Ruben Juanes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of the 2016-2018 fluid-injection induced seismicity in the High Agri Valley (Southern Italy) from improved detections using template matching.

Authors:  T A Stabile; Josef Vlček; Milosz Wcisło; Vincenzo Serlenga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.