Literature DB >> 1773767

Physiological studies of electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain.

J C Rothwell1.   

Abstract

It is suggested that transcranial electric stimulation can activate pyramidal tract projections both directly and indirectly in a manner similar to that described after direct stimulation of the exposed cortex in the monkey. This produces both D- and I-waves in the pyramidal tract. At high intensities of stimulation, the stimulus can spread into the brain and activate pyramidal tract axons several centimeters below the cortical surface. Magnetic stimulation at moderate intensities produces electromyographic (EMG) responses with latencies 1-2 msec longer than those after electric stimulation. Two possible explanations have been put forward to account for this effect: (1) because of the difference in the direction of electric current flow induced in the brain by the 2 forms of stimulation, magnetic stimulation preferentially excites pyramidal tract cells indirectly, and hence evokes only I-waves in the pyramidal tract. (2) Electric stimulation (even at threshold) activates pyramidal axons deep in the white matter, whereas magnetic stimulation activates the pyramidal cells in the gray matter, probably at their initial segment. There is one interesting consequence common to both explanations. Whether magnetic stimulation activates the pyramidal neurons transsynaptically or at their initial segment, the size of the descending volley evoked will depend on the level of excitability of the motor cortex. In contrast, the response to electric stimulation will be less affected, since a proportion of the descending volley is initiated directly at the axon of the pyramidal cell. This differential effect of cortical excitability on the responses to electrical and magnetic stimulation can be useful in describing excitatory or inhibitory influences on motor cortex from other structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1773767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl        ISSN: 0424-8155


  30 in total

1.  Experiments using transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in man could reveal important new mechanisms in motor control.

Authors:  S A Edgley; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Interaction of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical transmastoid stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  Janet L Taylor; N T Petersen; Jane E Butler; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Suppression of the transcallosal motor output: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Carlo Trompetto; Marco Bove; Lucio Marinelli; Laura Avanzino; Alessandro Buccolieri; Giovanni Abbruzzese
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Corticospinal activation of internal oblique muscles has a strong ipsilateral component and can be lateralised in man.

Authors:  Paul H Strutton; Iain D Beith; Sophie Theodorou; Maria Catley; Alison H McGregor; Nick J Davey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Paired associative stimulation induces change in presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals in wrist flexors in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Lamy; Heike Russmann; Ejaz A Shamim; Sabine Meunier; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Orientation-specific fast rTMS maximizes corticospinal inhibition and facilitation.

Authors:  Tobias Tings; Nicolas Lang; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor cortex excitability changes preceding voluntary muscle activity in simple reaction time task.

Authors:  M Nikolova; N Pondev; L Christova; W Wolf; A R Kossev
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Modulation of cortical oscillatory activity during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Debora Brignani; Paolo Manganotti; Paolo M Rossini; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Constraint-induced movement therapy results in increased motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after stroke.

Authors:  Lumy Sawaki; Andrew J Butler; Xiaoyan Leng; Peter A Wassenaar; Yousef M Mohammad; Sarah Blanton; K Sathian; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf; David C Good; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Ventral premotor to primary motor cortical interactions during object-driven grasp in humans.

Authors:  Marco Davare; Karli Montague; Etienne Olivier; John C Rothwell; Roger N Lemon
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.