Literature DB >> 17726627

Objective follow-up after laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia. Assessment of safety and durability.

Giovanni Zaninotto1, Giuseppe Portale, Mario Costantini, Pietro Fiamingo, Sabrina Rampado, Emanuela Guirroli, Loredana Nicoletti, Ermanno Ancona.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic results of laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernias, with/without prosthetic mesh, are often excellent; however, a high recurrence rate is detected when objective radiological/endoscopic follow-up is performed. The use of mesh may reduce the incidence of postoperative hernia recurrence or wrap migration in the chest.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 54 patients (10 men, 44 women; median: age 64.5 years) with a diagnosis of large type III hiatal hernia (>1/3 stomach in the chest on x-ray) who underwent laparoscopic repair at our department from January 1992 to June 2005. Complications, recurrences, and symptomatic and objective (radiological/endoscopic) long-term outcome were evaluated.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients had laparoscopic Nissen/Toupet fundoplication with simple suture; in 35 patients a double mesh was added. The median radiological/endoscopic follow-up was 64 months (interquartile range (IQR): 6-104) for the non-mesh group and 33 (IQR:12-61) for the mesh group (p = 0.26). Recurrences occurred in 11/54 (20%) patients: 8/19 (42.1%) without mesh and 3/35 (8.6%) with mesh (p = 0.01). The 3 recurrences in the mesh group all occurred < or =12 months postoperatively; 4/8 recurrences in the non-mesh group occurred > or =5 years after operation. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only mesh absence significantly predicted hernia recurrence or wrap migration. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernias is safe and effective. Short-term symptomatic results are excellent, but mid-term objective radiological/endoscopic evaluation reveals a high recurrence rate. Possible reasons for failure of a laparoscopic hiatal repair are tension or poor muscle tissue characteristics in the hiatus. The use of a mesh, either by reducing tension or reinforcing muscle at the hiatus, might be associated with a lower recurrence rate. Longer-term follow-up will be needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn, however.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17726627     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9212-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  25 in total

1.  Clinical and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  J S Wu; D L Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic reduction, crural repair, and fundoplication of large hiatal hernia.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Shimi; L K Nathanson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement.

Authors:  D Armstrong; J R Bennett; A L Blum; J Dent; F T De Dombal; J P Galmiche; L Lundell; M Margulies; J E Richter; S J Spechler; G N Tytgat; L Wallin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Short-term outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. A case series of 58 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T R Huntington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R A Hinder; C J Filipi; G Wetscher; P Neary; T R DeMeester; G Perdikis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Fatal cardiac tamponade after emergency tension-free repair of a large paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  E Kemppainen; T Kiviluoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-05-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; George P Stavropoulos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-06

8.  Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia.

Authors:  P S Dahlberg; C Deschamps; D L Miller; M S Allen; F C Nichols; P C Pairolero
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Durability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  M B Edye; J Canin-Endres; F Gattorno; B A Salky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Management of intrathoracic stomach with polypropylene mesh prosthesis reinforced transabdominal hiatus hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Carlson; R E Condon; K A Ludwig; W J Schulte
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  29 in total

1.  Approach to asymptomatic paraesophageal hernia: watchful waiting or elective laparoscopic hernia repair?

Authors:  James J Jung; David M Naimark; Ramy Behman; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quantifying tension in tension-free hiatal hernia repair: a new intra-operative technique.

Authors:  Lalin Navaratne; Hutan Ashrafian; Alberto Martínez-Isla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Dual-sided composite mesh repair of hiatal hernia: our experience and a review of the Chinese literature.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Wei Tang; Cheng-Xiang Shan; Sheng Liu; Zhi-Guo Jiang; Dao-Zhen Jiang; Xiang-Min Zheng; Ming Qiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Polypropylene, polyester or polytetrafluoroethylene-is there an ideal material for mesh augmentation at the esophageal hiatus? Results from an experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; J D Senft; F Lasitschka; M Shevchenko; A T Billeter; T Bruckner; H G Kenngott; L Fischer; T Gehrig
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Objective follow-up after laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: assessment of safety and durability.

Authors:  Eric J Hazebroek; Garett S Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  [Operative treatment of hiatus hernia : Evidence on mesh inlay].

Authors:  F A Granderath
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; G Quero; A Lapergola; L Guerriero; C Fiorillo; S Perretta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Routine use of mesh during hiatal closure is safe with no increase in adverse sequelae.

Authors:  Walid K Abu Saleh; Lee M Morris; Nabil Tariq; Min P Kim; Edward Y Chan; Leonora M Meisenbach; Brian J Dunkin; Vadim Sherman; Wade Rosenberg; Barbara L Bass; Edward A Graviss; Duc T Nguyen; Patrick Reardon; Puja G Khaitan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Is a circular polypropylene mesh appropriate for application at the esophageal hiatus? Results from an experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Beat P Müller-Stich; Arianeb Mehrabi; Hannes G Kenngott; Hamidreza Fonouni; Michael A Reiter; Gani Kuttymoratov; Felix Nickel; Georg R Linke; Ivo Wolf; Jörg Köninger; Carsten N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Predictive factors for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: age, ASA score and operation type influence morbidity.

Authors:  Hannes J Larusson; Urs Zingg; Dieter Hahnloser; Karen Delport; Burkhardt Seifert; Daniel Oertli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.