Literature DB >> 9294267

Short-term outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. A case series of 58 consecutive patients.

T R Huntington1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine the morbidity, mortality, and short-term outcomes associated with laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPHR).
METHODS: A series of 58 consecutive LPHRs performed by the author were reviewed with an average 1-year follow-up. Morbidity and mortality rates were compared with historical series of open repairs. Anatomy and technical considerations pertinent to LPHR were reviewed.
RESULTS: There were no procedure-related or perioperative deaths in this series of patients undergoing LPHR. Four major complications occurred (7%), two of which required reoperation, all in urgently repaired patients. One patient required conversion to laparotomy (1. 7%). Based on symptoms, there were no reherniations. No patients had long-term dysphagia worse than preoperatively. Preoperative symptoms of chest pain, esophageal obstruction, hemorrhage, and reflux were resolved in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: LPHR is safe, effective, and compares favorably to historical series of open paraesophageal hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9294267     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  The changing face of treatment for hiatus hernia and gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  D I Watson; P G Devitt; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair: a review of literature.

Authors:  W A Draaisma; H G Gooszen; E Tournoij; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications: a critical analysis of the available literature.

Authors:  J M Johnson; A M Carbonell; B J Carmody; M K Jamal; J W Maher; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: long-term outcome with the focus on the influence of mesh reinforcement.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; F Holzinger; T Kapp; C Klaiber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outcomes after repair of the intrathoracic stomach: objective follow-up of up to 5 years.

Authors:  S K Mittal; J Bikhchandani; O Gurney; F Yano; T Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Volume and outcomes relationship in laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair.

Authors:  Matthew D Whealon; Juan J Blondet; John V Gahagan; Michael J Phelan; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Durability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  M B Edye; J Canin-Endres; F Gattorno; B A Salky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A simplified technique for intrathoracic stomach repair: laparoscopic fundoplication with Vicryl mesh and BioGlue crural reinforcement.

Authors:  Jörg Zehetner; John C Lipham; Shahin Ayazi; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Weisheng Chen; Steven R Demeester; Helen J Sohn; Farzaneh Banki; Jeffrey A Hagen; Melissa Dickey; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic intervention for intrathoracic stomach in infants.

Authors:  M Yagi; K Nose; K Yamauchi; T Nogami; H Yoshida; H Okuyama; H Kawahara; H Ohyanagi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.