Literature DB >> 17723985

Breast Cancer Screening: Women's Experiences of Waiting for Further Testing.

Patricia Pineault1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To describe anxiety experienced by participants in a breast cancer screening program who have received an abnormal screening mammography result and are waiting for further testing and diagnosis and to identify the social support needed during this period.
DESIGN: Exploratory, descriptive.
SETTING: Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Program (QBCSP) participants in Montreal, Canada. SAMPLE: Nonprobability sample of 631 asymptomatic women, aged 50-69, who had abnormal screening mammogram results in the two months prior to the survey and who spoke or read French or English.
METHODS: Mailed self-report questionnaire. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Anxiety, social support, and breast cancer screening.
FINDINGS: Fifty-one percent of the participants were quite or very anxious at every stage of the prediagnostic phase. Seventy-five percent expressed their feelings to family and friends whose support was comforting but did not diminish participants' anxiety. Satisfaction from social support offered by healthcare professionals reduced their anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS: To decrease anxiety in the prediagnostic phase, women need support from healthcare professionals during the early stage of the screening process to prevent exacerbation of their concerns. Support has to be integrated into a continuity-of-care process. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses can play a significant role in breast cancer screening programs. They can evaluate, at an early stage, participant anxiety and offer the appropriate social support. They also can ensure the follow-up and personalized support required while a patient awaits a diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17723985     DOI: 10.1188/07.ONF.847-853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  11 in total

1.  Psychological Outcomes After a False Positive Mammogram: Preliminary Evidence for Ethnic Differences Across Time.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-02-19

2.  Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Rebecca A Silliman; Long H Ngo; Robyn L Birdwell; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Jessica Donato; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Clinical, demographic, and situational factors linked to distress associated with benign breast biopsy.

Authors:  Rachel F Steffens; Heather R Wright; Molly Y Hester; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2011

4.  A study of emotional states in candidates undergoing the diagnostic process for COVID-19.

Authors:  Sanjana Kathiravan; Kirtan Rana; Meha Verma; Krishan Kumar; Ritin Mohindra; Shubh Mohan Singh
Journal:  Ind Psychiatry J       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Online support: Impact on anxiety in women who experience an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  Eniola T Obadina; Lori L Dubenske; Helene E McDowell; Amy K Atwood; Deborah K Mayer; Ryan W Woods; David H Gustafson; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Development and feasibility of a set of quality indicators relative to the timeliness and organisation of care for new breast cancer patients undergoing surgery.

Authors:  Marie Ferrua; Mélanie Couralet; Gérard Nitenberg; Sandrine Morin; Daniel Serin; Etienne Minvielle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  "Appropriate" diagnostic testing: supporting diagnostics with evidence-based medicine and shared decision making.

Authors:  Julian J Z Polaris; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-12-16

8.  Reduced Time to Breast Cancer Diagnosis with Coordination of Radiological and Clinical Care.

Authors:  Elaine C McKevitt; Carol K Dingee; Sher-Ping Leung; Carl J Brown; Nancy Y Van Laeken; Richard Lee; Urve Kuusk
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-12-07

9.  Prenatal electrocardiogram testing and postpartum depression: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jonathan S Zipursky; Deva Thiruchelvam; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Impact of whole-body MRI in a general population study.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Elizabeth Sierocinski; Katrin Hegenscheid; Sebastian E Baumeister; Hans J Grabe; Henry Völzke
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.