Literature DB >> 21240724

Clinical, demographic, and situational factors linked to distress associated with benign breast biopsy.

Rachel F Steffens1, Heather R Wright, Molly Y Hester, Michael A Andrykowski.   

Abstract

Benign breast biopsy (BBB) can be distressing for many women. Few studies have examined specific aspects of the BBB more or less distressing or risk factors for distress. Women (N = 51) who had a recent BBB reported the magnitude of distress associated with specific aspects of their experience. Clinical and demographic variables were also examined as risk factors for distress. All women reported some distress associated with the BBB with one third reporting their experience was "very stressful." Generally, biopsy-specific events were more distressing than follow-up mammography. Distress risk factors included younger age, less education, nonsurgical biopsy, and no family history of breast cancer. Clinical efforts to better manage biopsy-related distress are warranted. The authors identified clinical and demographic risk factors that furnish a simple, efficient, and potentially cost-effective means of stratifying risk for distress in the breast biopsy setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240724      PMCID: PMC3319914          DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2011.534024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol        ISSN: 0734-7332


  50 in total

1.  Psychological distress in U.S. women who have experienced false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Kangmin Zhu; Mona Shah; William Lawrence
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Predicting biopsy outcome after mammography: what is the likelihood the patient has invasive or in situ breast cancer?

Authors:  Donald L Weaver; Pamela M Vacek; Joan M Skelly; Berta M Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Breast cancer attitudes, knowledge, and screening behavior in women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  B J Hailey; C L Carter; D R Burnett
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2000-12

4.  Physical symptoms, distress, and breast cancer risk perceptions in women with benign breast problems.

Authors:  L L Cunningham; M A Andrykowski; J F Wilson; P C McGrath; D A Sloan; D E Kenady
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Psychological adjustment in breast cancer: processes of emotional distress.

Authors:  J E Epping-Jordan; B E Compas; D M Osowiecki; G Oppedisano; C Gerhardt; K Primo; D N Krag
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  F J Gilbert; C M Cordiner; I R Affleck; D B Hood; D Mathieson; L G Walker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  The impact of abnormal mammograms on psychosocial outcomes and subsequent screening.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; S Halabi; T S Strigo; B K Rimer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  The value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with nodular thyroid disease divided into groups of suspicion of malignant neoplasms on clinical grounds.

Authors:  J F Hamming; B M Goslings; G J van Steenis; H van Ravenswaay Claasen; J Hermans; C J van de Velde
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-01

9.  Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.

Authors:  J Brett; J Austoker; G Ong
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1998-12

10.  High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients.

Authors:  L E Carlson; M Angen; J Cullum; E Goodey; J Koopmans; L Lamont; J H MacRae; M Martin; G Pelletier; J Robinson; J S A Simpson; M Speca; L Tillotson; B D Bultz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Psychological distress, social withdrawal, and coping following receipt of an abnormal mammogram among different ethnicities: a mediation model.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Noah Espinoza; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  How Many of the Biopsy Decisions Taken at Inexperienced Breast Radiology Units Were Correct?

Authors:  Özlem Demircioğlu; Meral Uluer; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Rebecca A Silliman; Long H Ngo; Robyn L Birdwell; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Jessica Donato; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Breast biopsy patterns and findings among older women undergoing screening mammography: The role of age and comorbidity.

Authors:  Shailesh Advani; Linn Abraham; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; John T Schousboe; Joshua Demb; Dongyu Zhang; Louise C Walter; Christoph I Lee; Dejana Braithwaite; Ellen S O'Meara
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  The relationship between holding back from communicating about breast concerns and anxiety in the year following breast biopsy.

Authors:  Caroline S Dorfman; Eneka Lamb; Alyssa Van Denburg; Anava A Wren; Mary Scott Soo; Kaylee Faircloth; Vicky Gandhi; Rebecca A Shelby
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11

6.  Percutaneous breast biopsy: effect on short-term quality of life.

Authors:  Kathryn L Humphrey; Janie M Lee; Karen Donelan; Chung Y Kong; Olubunmi Williams; Omosalewa Itauma; Elkan F Halpern; Beverly J Gerade; Elizabeth A Rafferty; J Shannon Swan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Psychological consequences of MRI-based screening among women with strong family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew Castelo; Zachary Brown; Josephine A D'Abbondanza; Nastasia V Wasilewski; Andrea Eisen; Derek Muradali; Bettina E Hansen; Eva Grunfeld; Adena S Scheer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Psychosocial consequences of false-positive results in screening mammography.

Authors:  Zeina El Hachem; Marouan Zoghbi; Souheil Hallit
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-02

9.  Symptom distress associated with biopsy in women with suspect breast lesions.

Authors:  Jayesh Kamath; Dean G Cruess; Kevin Claffey; Lori Wilson; Natalie Phoenix; Susan Tannenbaum
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-07-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.