Literature DB >> 26487180

Stability control during the performance of a simultaneous obstacle avoidance and auditory Stroop task.

Timothy A Worden, Lori Ann Vallis.   

Abstract

Navigation through complex environments requires a greater degree of control and attentional resources from the central nervous system to ensure postural stability and efficient goal completion as compared to quiet standing or unobstructed walking. Furthermore, when a cognitive task is also performed in a dual-task scenario, additional resources may be required. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects of performing a concurrent cognitive (auditory Stroop task) and complex locomotor task (with a stationary or dynamic obstacle) on frontal plane stability control quantified using a margin of stability (MOS) measure. Fourteen healthy young adults performed 40 dual-task trials (randomized in a balanced design for auditory Stroop congruency and obstacle movement). Results indicated that frontal plane MOS was greatest for the obstacle crossing step and was greater for the dynamic obstacle as compared to the stationary obstacle. Conversely, frontal plane MOS was the smallest for the pre-crossing step, indicating that this point in the obstacle stepping strategy may be the least stable. No effect of cognitive task difficulty was observed for any of the experimental conditions, providing support for a 'posture-first' strategy. These findings suggest that an increase in stability is prioritized for the obstacle crossing step, potentially at the expense of reduced stability in the step immediately preceding the obstacle. These results have implications for better understanding how the CNS controls stability at different events during the obstacle crossing strategy in a complex environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26487180     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4461-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Predictive control of body mass trajectory in a two-step sequence.

Authors:  Ian N Lyon; Brian L Day
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources.

Authors:  Ka-Chun Siu; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  The discriminant capabilities of stability measures, trunk kinematics, and step kinematics in classifying successful and failed compensatory stepping responses by young adults.

Authors:  Jeremy R Crenshaw; Noah J Rosenblatt; Christopher P Hurt; Mark D Grabiner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Control of frontal plane body motion in human stepping.

Authors:  I N Lyon; B L Day
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Voluntary changes in step width and step length during human walking affect dynamic margins of stability.

Authors:  Patricia M McAndrew Young; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Concurrent performance of a cognitive and dynamic obstacle avoidance task: influence of dual-task training.

Authors:  Timothy A Worden; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  EEG measures reveal dual-task interference in postural performance in young adults.

Authors:  C Elaine Little; Marjorie Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Age-dependent differences in the attentional demands of obstacle negotiation.

Authors:  Lesley A Brown; Nicole C McKenzie; Jon B Doan
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Cognitive demand and predictive adaptational responses in dynamic stability control.

Authors:  Sebastian Bohm; Falk Mersmann; Stefanie Bierbaum; Ralf Dietrich; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  7 in total

1.  Validation of simplified centre of mass models during gait in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Andrew H Huntley; Alison Schinkel-Ivy; Anthony Aqui; Avril Mansfield
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The influence of carrying an anterior load on attention demand and obstacle clearance before, during, and after obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Deborah A Jehu; Deanna Saunders; Natalie Richer; Nicole Paquet; Yves Lajoie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Do perturbation-evoked responses result in higher reaction time costs depending on the direction and magnitude of perturbation?

Authors:  Keaton A Inkol; Andrew H Huntley; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Changes in motor actions in the face of varying task constraints.

Authors:  Daekyoo Kim; Xia Pu; Nicole Woo; Simone V Gill
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Exploring the cognitive demands required for young adults to adjust online obstacle avoidance strategies.

Authors:  Jenna Pitman; Keara Sutherland; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Young adults perceive small disturbances to their walking balance even when distracted.

Authors:  Daniel J Liss; Hannah D Carey; Sergiy Yakovenko; Jessica L Allen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 7.  Dual Tasking during Trip Recovery and Obstacle Clearance among Young, Healthy Adults in Human Factors Research.

Authors:  Sachini N K Kodithuwakku Arachchige; Harish Chander; Adam C Knight; Reuben F Burch V; Chih-Chia Chen; Jennifer C Reneker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.