Literature DB >> 1771793

Efficiency of locating centres of dot-clusters by human observers.

M J Morgan1, A Glennerster.   

Abstract

A spatial interval acuity task was used to determine the efficiency with which observers located the centroids of circular clusters of individually-small elements. A cluster was defined by its radius and by the number of elements within it. The observer's task was to compare the horizontal distance between the centres of two such clusters to a standard distance, and to decide whether it was greater or smaller. The standard distance was made explicit by two markers on the display screen. As expected on statistical grounds, thresholds increased with the radius of the clusters, and decreased as a function of the number of elements. There were considerable individual differences in efficiency between observers, but the best observers achieved efficiencies close to 100% in many of the conditions. One anomalous observer showed virtually no decrease in thresholds as the number of elements increased, and thus her efficiencies declined to as little as 10%. The ability to combine positional information over spatially-separated elements to obtain an estimate of their central tendency appears in general to be high, and may underlie the perceptual biases revealed in certain geometric illusions, such as the Müller-Lyer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1771793     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90165-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Observers can voluntarily shift their psychometric functions without losing sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Barbara Dillenburger; Sabine Raphael; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  A foveal target increases catch-up saccade frequency during smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Stephen J Heinen; Elena Potapchuk; Scott N J Watamaniuk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The Müller-Lyer contrast illusion: a computational approach.

Authors:  G M Redding; G D Winson; R O Temple
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10

4.  Not all summary statistics are made equal: Evidence from extracting summaries across time.

Authors:  Bjorn Hubert-Wallander; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The visual system discounts emotional deviants when extracting average expression.

Authors:  Jason Haberman; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Ensemble crowd perception: a viewpoint-invariant mechanism to represent average crowd identity.

Authors:  Allison Yamanashi Leib; Jason Fischer; Yang Liu; Sang Qiu; Lynn Robertson; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The Poggendorff illusion: a bias in the estimation of the orientation of virtual lines by second-stage filters.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Testing day: The effects of processing bias induced by Navon stimuli on the strength of the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Matthew E Mundy
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-02-20

9.  Ensemble perception of color in autistic adults.

Authors:  John Maule; Kirstie Stanworth; Elizabeth Pellicano; Anna Franklin
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.216

10.  Processing of Individual Items during Ensemble Coding of Facial Expressions.

Authors:  Huiyun Li; Luyan Ji; Ke Tong; Naixin Ren; Wenfeng Chen; Chang Hong Liu; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.