Literature DB >> 8255715

The Müller-Lyer contrast illusion: a computational approach.

G M Redding1, G D Winson, R O Temple.   

Abstract

When a temporal delay is interposed between the contextual elements (wings) and the focal element (central axis) of the Müller-Lyer figures, the usual assimilation illusion changes to an illusion of contrast; that is, judged axis length is contrasted away from rather than assimilated toward the context provided by parallel extents between wings. Presentation time for the preceding contextual wings on the order of 1 sec or more was needed to produce contrast effects in judgments of the following focal axis (Experiment 3) and, given sufficient presentation time, these contrast effects were largely unaffected by the length of the temporal delay between contextual and focal elements, appearing equally strong for delays between 0 and 2 sec (Experiments 1 and 2). These results are consistent with a representational basis for these contrast effects that is high-level and long-lived. The Müller-Lyer contrast illusion may reflect the inadvertent error arising from basing judgments about particular objects on information about attribute differences among objects. Such judgmental errors may be the natural consequence of constrained computations that make explicit information required for certain common tasks, but at the expense of obscuring information required for less common tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8255715     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  28 in total

1.  The effects of varying fins in Müller-Lyer and Holding illusions.

Authors:  A Pressey; N S Martin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

2.  Simultaneous sampling and length contrast.

Authors:  K Jordan; P W English
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-12

3.  Length contrast in the Müller-Lyer figure: functional equivalence of temporal and spatial separation.

Authors:  K Jordan; J Uhlarik
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-04

4.  Orientation specificity of length assimilation and contrast.

Authors:  K Jordan; J Haleblian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-05

5.  Perceived length depends on exposure duration: straight lines and Müller-Lyer stimuli.

Authors:  A Erlebacher; R Sekuler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-10

6.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Visual routines.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

8.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Control stimuli in investigations of the acute-angled and obtuse-angled Müller-Lyer illusions.

Authors:  J Adam; L Bateman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Effects of distance between standard and comparison lines on the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  A W Pressey; V Di Lollo
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.