Literature DB >> 17717326

Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Rolf Wyttenbach1, Antonio Braghetti, Michael Wyss, Mario Alerci, Lukas Briner, Paolo Santini, Luca Cozzi, Marcello Di Valentino, Marcus Katoh, Claudio Marone, Peter Vock, Augusto Gallino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of nonenhanced three-dimensional (3D) steady-state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS), with breath-hold contrast material-enhanced MR angiography performed as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was local ethics committee approved; all patients gave written informed consent. Fifty-three patients (30 male, 23 female; mean age, 58 years) with arterial hypertension and suspected of having RAS were examined with 1.5-T 3D SSFP renal MR angiography. Stenosis grade, maximal visible vessel length, and subjective image quality were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated on artery-by-artery and patient-by-patient bases. The significance of the results was assessed with the paired two-sided t test for continuous variables and with the marginal homogeneity test for categorical variables. Cohen kappa statistics were used to estimate interobserver agreement.
RESULTS: One hundred eight renal arteries with 20 significant (>or=50%) stenoses were detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. At artery-by-artery analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and NPV of nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography for RAS detection were 100%, 93%, 94%, and 100%, respectively, for observer 1 and 95%, 95%, 95%, and 99%, respectively, for observer 2. Corresponding patient-by-patient values were 100%, 92%, 94%, and 100%, respectively, for observer 1 and 100%, 95%, 96%, and 100%, respectively, for observer 2. Overestimation of stenosis grade with SSFP MR angiography resulted in six and four false-positive findings for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Mean maximal visible lengths of the renal arteries were 69.9 mm at contrast-enhanced MR angiography and 61.1 mm at SSFP MR angiography (P<.001). Both techniques yielded good to excellent image quality.
CONCLUSION: Slab-selective inversion-prepared 3D SSFP MR angiography had high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and NPV for RAS detection, without the need for contrast material. However, RAS severity was overestimated in some patients. Copyright (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717326     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443061769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Is there a role for free breathing non-contrast steady-state free precession renal MRA imaging for assessing live donors? A preliminary study.

Authors:  I Laurence; B Ariff; R A Quest; S Moser; A Glover; D Taube; P Gishen; V Papalois; C Juli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model.

Authors:  T A Bley; C J François; M L Schiebler; O Wieben; N Takei; J H Brittain; A Munoz Del Rio; T M Grist; S B Reeder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dynamically applied B1+ shimming solutions for non-contrast enhanced renal angiography at 7.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Gregory J Metzger; Edward J Auerbach; Can Akgun; Josh Simonson; Xiaoming Bi; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-François van de Moortele
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance renal angiography using a repetitive artery and venous labelling technique at 3 T: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in subjects with normal renal function.

Authors:  Sung Yoon Park; Chan Kyo Kim; EunJu Kim; Byung Kwan Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A 3D balanced-SSFP Dixon technique with group-encoded k-space segmentation for breath-held non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Manojkumar Saranathan; Ersin Bayram; Pauline W Worters; James F Glockner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Non-contrast MR angiography using three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession imaging for evaluation of stenosis in the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery: a preliminary comparative study with computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Patricia P Cardia; Thiago J Penachim; Adilson Prando; Ulysses S Torres; Giuseppe D'Ippólito
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Non-gadolinium-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of thoracic aortic disease: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Monvadi B Srichai; Sooah Kim; Leon Axel; James Babb; Elizabeth M Hecht
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

9.  Quadruple inversion-recovery b-SSFP MRA of the abdomen: initial clinical validation.

Authors:  Iliyana P Atanasova; Ruth P Lim; Hersh Chandarana; Pippa Storey; Mary T Bruno; Daniel Kim; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  3D FIESTA pulse sequence for assessing renal artery stenosis: is it a reliable application in unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography?

Authors:  Caterina Gaudiano; Fiorenza Busato; Emiliana Ferramosca; Carlo Cecchelli; Beniamino Corcioni; Lucia Barbara De Sanctis; Antonio Santoro; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.