Literature DB >> 17714292

Male choice generates stabilizing sexual selection on a female fecundity correlate.

S F Chenoweth1, D Petfield, P Doughty, M W Blows.   

Abstract

We know very little about male mating preferences and how they influence the evolution of female traits. Theory predicts that males may benefit from choosing females on the basis of traits that indicate their fecundity. Here, we explore sexual selection generated by male choice on two components of female body size (wing length and body mass) in Drosophila serrata. Using a dietary manipulation to alter female size and 828 male mate choice trials, we analysed linear and nonlinear sexual selection gradients on female mass and wing length. In contrast to theoretical expectations and prevailing empirical data, males exerted stabilizing rather than directional sexual selection on female body mass, a correlate of fecundity. Sexual selection was detected only among females with access to standard resource levels as an adult, with no evidence for sexual selection among resource-depleted females. Thus the mating success of females with the same body mass differed depending upon their access to resources as an adult. This suggests that males in this species may rely on signal traits to assess body mass rather than assessing it directly. Stabilizing rather than directional sexual selection on body mass together with recent evidence for stabilizing sexual selection on candidate signal traits in this species suggests that females may trade-off resources allocated to reproduction and sexual signalling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714292     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01390.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  9 in total

1.  Physical and Linkage Maps for Drosophila serrata, a Model Species for Studies of Clinal Adaptation and Sexual Selection.

Authors:  Ann J Stocker; Bosco B Rusuwa; Mark J Blacket; Francesca D Frentiu; Mitchell Sullivan; Bradley R Foley; Scott Beatson; Ary A Hoffmann; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.

Authors:  Thomas P Gosden; Adam J Reddiex; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reproductive competition promotes the evolution of female weaponry.

Authors:  Nicola L Watson; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda; Andrew D Stewart; William R Rice
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus.

Authors:  Melissa L Thomas; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Mark A F Gillingham; David S Richardson; Hanne Løvlie; Anna Moynihan; Kirsty Worley; Tom Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Persistent Copulation in Asexual Female Potamopyrgus antipodarum: Evidence for Male Control with Size-Based Preferences.

Authors:  Amanda E Nelson; Maurine Neiman
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-02-27

8.  Condition, not eyespan, predicts contest outcome in female stalk-eyed flies, Teleopsis dalmanni.

Authors:  Eleanor Bath; Stuart Wigby; Claire Vincent; Joseph A Tobias; Nathalie Seddon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Single-Molecule Sequencing of the Drosophila serrata Genome.

Authors:  Scott L Allen; Emily K Delaney; Artyom Kopp; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.154

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.