Literature DB >> 20200030

Reproductive competition promotes the evolution of female weaponry.

Nicola L Watson1, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

Secondary sexual traits in females are a relatively rare phenomenon. Empirical studies have focused on the role of male mate choice in their evolution; however, recently it has been suggested that secondary sexual traits in females are more likely to be under selection via reproductive competition. We investigated female competition and the influence of female phenotype on fitness in Onthophagus sagittarius, a species of dung beetle that exhibits female-specific horns. We compared reproductive fitness when females were breeding in competition versus breeding alone and found that competition for breeding resources reduced fitness for all females, but that smaller individuals suffered a greater fitness reduction than larger individuals. When females were matched for body size, those with the longest horns gained higher reproductive fitness. The fitness function was positive and linear, favouring increased horn expression. Thus, we present evidence that female body size and horn size in O. sagittarius are under directional selection via competition for reproductive resources. Our study is a rare example of female contest competition selecting for female weaponry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20200030      PMCID: PMC2880095          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish.

Authors:  T Amundsen; E Forsgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  J Hunt; L W Simmons
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Effects of brood parasitism on host reproductive success: evidence from larval interactions among dung beetles.

Authors:  Adela González-Megías; Francisco Sánchez-Piñero
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Extreme reversed sexual dichromatism in a bird without sex role reversal.

Authors:  Robert Heinsohn; Sarah Legge; John A Endler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ornament evolution in dragon lizards: multiple gains and widespread losses reveal a complex history of evolutionary change.

Authors:  T J Ord; D Stuart-Fox
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Female finery is not for males.

Authors:  Natasha R LeBas
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Sexual selection in males and females.

Authors:  Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Evolution of weaponry in female bovids.

Authors:  Theodore Stankowich; Tim Caro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Longevity cost of reproduction for males but no longevity cost of mating or courtship for females in the male-dimorphic dung beetle Onthophagus binodis.

Authors:  Janne S Kotiaho; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Robert Montgomerie; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Sexual selection is a form of social selection.

Authors:  Bruce E Lyon; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Competitive females are successful females; phenotype, mechanism and selection in a common songbird.

Authors:  Kristal E Cain; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Ewe are what ewe wear: bigger horns, better ewes and the potential consequence of trophy hunting on female fitness in bighorn sheep.

Authors:  Samuel Deakin; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Joshua M Miller; Fanie Pelletier; David W Coltman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Female competition and aggression: interdisciplinary perspectives.

Authors:  Paula Stockley; Anne Campbell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Reproductive competition and sexual selection.

Authors:  Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds: why are females not bigger and better armed?

Authors:  Andrew J Young; Nigel C Bennett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Condition, not eyespan, predicts contest outcome in female stalk-eyed flies, Teleopsis dalmanni.

Authors:  Eleanor Bath; Stuart Wigby; Claire Vincent; Joseph A Tobias; Nathalie Seddon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating.

Authors:  Charlotta Kvarnemo; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Epigenetic mechanisms underlying developmental plasticity in horned beetles.

Authors:  Sophie Valena; Armin P Moczek
Journal:  Genet Res Int       Date:  2012-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.