Literature DB >> 8807274

Effects of acclimatization and deprivation on non-speech auditory abilities.

D Byrne1, D Dirks.   

Abstract

This article reviews the evidence for acclimatization and deprivation with respect to non-speech auditory abilities. Although this subject has not been studied extensively, clear evidence exists for acclimatization and/or deprivation effects on intensity discrimination, binaural masking level difference, and auditory localization and lateralization. There is also some argument for such effects with regard to changes in tolerance for intense sounds or preferred levels of amplification. However, the main evidence for these effects, changes in loudness discomfort levels with repeated testing, may reasonably be explained as procedural or task-related effects rather than changes in auditory abilities. On the other hand, the successful use of tinnitus maskers to treat hyperacusis suggests that particularly low tolerance levels may be improved by exposure to certain types of auditory stimulation. Overall, this retrospective review of changes in non-speech auditory abilities, associated with the presence or absence of listening experience, indicates that acclimatization or deprivation effects may have influenced the results of some of the experiments reviewed. This suggests that experiments designed to study acclimatization or deprivation are timely and useful. In addition, acclimatization and deprivation are potential variables that should be considered, and preferably controlled, within experiments on auditory abilities. Clinically, the review adds weight to the argument for considering acclimatization and/or deprivation in hearing aid fitting and evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807274     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199617031-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  6 in total

1.  Localization of sound in rooms. V. Binaural coherence and human sensitivity to interaural time differences in noise.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

Review 3.  Repeated Measurement of Absolute and Relative Judgments of Loudness: Clinical Relevance for Prescriptive Fitting of Aided Target Gains for soft, Comfortable, and Loud, But Ok Sound Levels.

Authors:  Craig Formby; JoAnne Payne; Xin Yang; Delphanie Wu; Jason M Parton
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 4.  Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.

Authors:  Helen J Simon; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

Review 5.  Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.

Authors:  T Y C Ching; E van Wanrooy; H Dillon
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

6.  A Sound Therapy-Based Intervention to Expand the Auditory Dynamic Range for Loudness among Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Losses: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Craig Formby; Monica L Hawley; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Susan Gold; JoAnne Payne; Rebecca Brooks; Jason M Parton; Roger Juneau; Edward J Desporte; Gregory R Siegle
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.