Literature DB >> 16849151

Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion.

C-Y Hui1, N J Glassmaker, T Tang, A Jagota.   

Abstract

This study addresses the strength and toughness of generic fibrillar structures. We show that the stress sigmac required to pull a fibril out of adhesive contact with a substrate has the form sigma(c) = sigma(0)Phi(chi). In this equation, sigma(0) is the interfacial strength, Phi(chi) is a dimensionless function satisfying 0 <or= Phi(chi) <or= 1 and chi is a dimensionless parameter that depends on the interfacial properties, as well as the fibril stiffness and radius. Pull-off is flaw sensitive for chi >> 1, but is flaw insensitive for chi < 1. The important parameter chi also controls the stability of a homogeneously deformed non-fibrillar (flat) interface. Using these results, we show that the work to fail a unit area of fibrillar surface can be much higher than the intrinsic work of adhesion for a flat interface of the same material. In addition, we show that cross-sectional fibril dimensions control the pull-off force, which increases with decreasing fibril radius. Finally, an increase in fibril length is shown to increase the work necessary to separate a fibrillar interface. Besides our calculations involving a single fibril, we study the concept of equal load sharing (ELS) for a perfect interface containing many fibrils. We obtain the practical work of adhesion for an idealized fibrillated interface under equal load sharing. We then analyse the peeling of a fibrillar surface from a rigid substrate and establish a criterion for ELS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16849151      PMCID: PMC1618930          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2004.0005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  34 in total

1.  Role of adhesion between asperities in the formation of elastic solid/solid contacts.

Authors:  L Dies; F Restagno; R Weil; L Léger; C Poulard
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Characterization of the structure and composition of gecko adhesive setae.

Authors:  N W Rizzo; K H Gardner; D J Walls; N M Keiper-Hrynko; T S Ganzke; D L Hallahan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Can a fibrillar interface be stronger and tougher than a non-fibrillar one?

Authors:  Tian Tang; Chung-Yuen Hui; Nicholas J Glassmaker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Adhesion and sliding response of a biologically inspired fibrillar surface: experimental observations.

Authors:  H Yao; G Della Rocca; P R Guduru; H Gao
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Effect of interfacial slippage in peel test: theoretical model.

Authors:  Z X Lu; S W Yu; X Y Wang; X Q Feng
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 1.890

6.  Biologically inspired crack trapping for enhanced adhesion.

Authors:  Nicholas J Glassmaker; Anand Jagota; Chung-Yuen Hui; William L Noderer; Manoj K Chaudhury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tuning the geometrical parameters of biomimetic fibrillar structures to enhance adhesion.

Authors:  Shaohua Chen; Ai Kah Soh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Compliance of a microfibril subjected to shear and normal loads.

Authors:  Jingzhou Liu; Chung-Yuen Hui; Lulin Shen; Anand Jagota
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Strength statistics of adhesive contact between a fibrillar structure and a rough substrate.

Authors:  Pankaj K Porwal; Chung Yuen Hui
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Functional demands of dynamic biological adhesion: an integrative approach.

Authors:  Anne M Peattie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.