Literature DB >> 17709149

A phase I study of dose-escalated chemoradiation with accelerated intensity modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Teresa Guerrero Urbano1, Catharine H Clark, Vibeke N Hansen, Elizabeth J Adams, Roger A'Hern, Elizabeth A Miles, Helen McNair, Margaret Bidmead, Alan P Warrington, David P Dearnaley, Kevin J Harrington, Christopher M Nutting.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) allows the delivery of higher and more homogeneous radiation dose to head and neck tumours. This study aims to determine the safety of dose-escalated chemo-IMRT for larynx preservation in locally advanced head and neck cancer.
METHODS: Patients with T2-4, N1-3, M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx or hypopharynx were treated with a simultaneous-boost IMRT. Two radiation dose levels (DL) were tested: In DL 1, 63 Gy/28F was delivered to primary tumour and involved nodes and 51.8 Gy/28F to elective nodes. In DL 2, the doses were 67.2 Gy/28F and 56 Gy/28F, respectively, representing a 9% dose escalation for the primary. All patients received 2 cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, and concomitant cisplatin. Acute (NCICTCv.2.0) and late toxicity (RTOG and modified LENTSOM) were collected.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were entered, 15 in each dose level. All patients completed the treatment schedule. In DL 1, the incidences of acute G3 toxicities were 27% (pain), 20% (radiation dermatitis), 0% (xerostomia) and 67% required gastrostomy tubes. For DL 2 the corresponding incidences were 40%, 20%, 7%, and 87%. G3 dysphagia and pain persisted longer in DL 2. With regard to mucositis, a prolonged healing time for DL 2 was found, with prevalence of G2 of 58% in week 10. No acute grade 4 toxicity was observed. At 6 months, 1 patient in DL 2 had G3 late toxicity (dysphagia). No dose limiting toxicity was found. Complete response rates were 80% in DL 1, and 87% in DL 2.
CONCLUSION: Moderately accelerated chemo-IMRT is safe and feasible with good compliance and acceptable acute toxicity. Dose escalation was possible without a significant difference in acute toxicity. Longer follow-up is required to determine the incidence of late radiation toxicities, and tumour control rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17709149     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  14 in total

Review 1.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of helical tomotherapy, forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-phase conformal plans for radical radiotherapy treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  S Chatterjee; N Willis; S M Locks; J H Mott; C G Kelly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Balancing risk and reward in target delineation for highly conformal radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost in head-and-neck cancer: is there a place for critical swallowing structures dose sparing?

Authors:  Savino Cilla; Francesco Deodato; Gabriella Macchia; Cinzia Digesù; Anna Ianiro; Angelo Piermattei; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessio G Morganti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Relation of mucous membrane alterations to oral intake during the first year after treatment for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Jerilyn A Logemann; Donna Lundy; Michelle Bernstein; Carrie McBreen; Daphne Santa; Angela Campanelli; Lisa Kelchner; Bernice Klaben; Muveddet Discekici-Harris
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 6.  Clinical evaluation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers.

Authors:  S A Bhide; K L Newbold; K J Harrington; C M Nutting
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Clinical challenges in the implementation of a tomotherapy service for head and neck cancer patients in a regional UK radiotherapy centre.

Authors:  S Chatterjee; J H Mott; G Smyth; S Dickson; W Dobrowsky; C G Kelly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  IMRT: preliminary results in a series of advanced head-and-neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Antonio Vila Capel; Jorge Vilar Palop; Agustín Pedro Olivé; Alberto Sanchez-Reyes Fernandez; Jordi Vayreda Ribera; Joan Carles Julià Sanahuja; Joaquim Pérez de Olaguer Agustín; Nuria Artola Codina; Luis Miguel Moya Cascant; Esther Rubio Calatayud; Gemma Carrera Domenech
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Long-term results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy concomitant with chemotherapy for hypopharyngeal carcinoma aimed at laryngeal preservation.

Authors:  Wen-Shan Liu; Chung-Han Hsin; Ying-Hsiang Chou; Jung-Tung Liu; Ming-Fang Wu; Szu-Wen Tseng; Jong-Kang Lee; Hsien-Chun Tseng; Tzu-Hwei Wang; Mao-Chang Su; Huei Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Guidelines for preclinical and early phase clinical assessment of novel radiosensitisers.

Authors:  K J Harrington; L J Billingham; T B Brunner; N G Burnet; C S Chan; P Hoskin; R I Mackay; T S Maughan; J Macdougall; W G McKenna; C M Nutting; A Oliver; R Plummer; I J Stratford; T Illidge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.