Literature DB >> 17705639

On the chemical yield of base lesions, strand breaks, and clustered damage generated in plasmid DNA by the direct effect of X rays.

Shubhadeep Purkayastha1, Jamie R Milligan, William A Bernhard.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the yield of DNA base damages, deoxyribose damage, and clustered lesions due to the direct effects of ionizing radiation and to compare these with the yield of DNA trapped radicals measured previously in the same pUC18 plasmid. The plasmids were prepared as films hydrated in the range 2.5 < Gamma < 22.5 mol water/mol nucleotide. Single-strand breaks (SSBs) and double-strand breaks (DSBs) were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Specific types of base lesions were converted into SSBs and DSBs using the base-excision repair enzymes endonuclease III (Nth) and formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg). The yield of base damage detected by this method displayed a strikingly different dependence on the level of hydration (Gamma) compared with that for the yield of DNA trapped radicals; the former decreased by 3.2 times as Gamma was varied from 2.5 to 22.5 and the later increased by 2.4 times over the same range. To explain this divergence, we propose that SSB yields produced in plasmid DNA by the direct effect cannot be analyzed properly with a Poisson process that assumes an average of one strand break per plasmid and neglects the possibility of a single track producing multiple SSBs within a plasmid. The yields of DSBs, on the other hand, are consistent with changes in free radical trapping as a function of hydration. Consequently, the composition of these clusters could be quantified. Deoxyribose damage on each of the two opposing strands occurs with a yield of 3.5 +/- 0.5 nmol/J for fully hydrated pUC18, comparable to the yield of 4.1 +/- 0.9 nmol/J for DSBs derived from opposed damages in which at least one of the sites is a damaged base.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705639      PMCID: PMC2631664          DOI: 10.1667/RR0964.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  38 in total

1.  Track structure in DNA irradiated with heavy ions.

Authors:  Michael K Bowman; David Becker; Michael D Sevilla; John D Zimbrick
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Enzymatic processing of radiation-induced free radical damage in DNA.

Authors:  S S Wallace
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  The effect of packing and conformation on free radical yields in films of variably hydrated DNA.

Authors:  M T Milano; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Radiation-induced DNA damage as a function of hydration. II. Base damage from electron-loss centers.

Authors:  S G Swarts; D Becker; M Sevilla; K T Wheeler
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  The role of hydration in the distribution of free radical trapping in directly ionized DNA.

Authors:  Shubhadeep Purkayastha; Jamie R Milligan; William A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 6.  Molecular and biological roles of Ape1 protein in mammalian base excision repair.

Authors:  Bruce Demple; Jung-Suk Sung
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-09-30

7.  Yield of DNA strand breaks after base oxidation of plasmid DNA.

Authors:  J R Milligan; J A Aguilera; T T Nguyen; J F Ward; Y W Kow; B He; R P Cunningham
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Excision of 5,6-dihydroxy-5,6-dihydrothymine, 5,6-dihydrothymine, and 5-hydroxycytosine from defined sequence oligonucleotides by Escherichia coli endonuclease III and Fpg proteins: kinetic and mechanistic aspects.

Authors:  C D'Ham; A Romieu; M Jaquinod; D Gasparutto; J Cadet
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Yields of OH in gamma-irradiated DNA as a function of DNA hydration: hole transfer in competition with OH formation.

Authors:  T La Vere; D Becker; M D Sevilla
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Antimutagenic role of base-excision repair enzymes upon free radical-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  J Laval; J Jurado; M Saparbaev; O Sidorkina
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-06-18       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  16 in total

1.  Mechanisms of strand break formation in DNA due to the direct effect of ionizing radiation: the dependency of free base release on the length of alternating CG oligodeoxynucleotides.

Authors:  Kiran K Sharma; Yuriy Razskazovskiy; Shubhadeep Purkayastha; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Which DNA damage is likely to be relevant in hormetic responses?

Authors:  William A Bernhard; Shubhadeep Purkayastha; Jamie R Milligan
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Damage clusters after gamma irradiation of a nanoparticulate plasmid DNA peptide condensate.

Authors:  Trinh T Do; Vicky J Tang; Katie Konigsfeld; Joe A Aguilera; Chris C Perry; Jamie R Milligan
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  What fraction of DNA double-strand breaks produced by the direct effect is accounted for by radical pairs?

Authors:  Anita R Peoples; Kermit R Mercer; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Mechanisms of direct radiation damage to DNA: the effect of base sequence on base end products.

Authors:  Kiran K K Sharma; Steven G Swarts; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Multiplicity of DNA single-strand breaks produced in pUC18 exposed to the direct effects of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar K Sharma; Jamie R Milligan; William A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  The mutagenicity of thymidine glycol in Escherichia coli is increased when it is part of a tandem lesion.

Authors:  Haidong Huang; Shuhei Imoto; Marc M Greenberg
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  DNA strand break dependence on Tris and arginine scavenger concentrations under ultra-soft X-ray irradiation: the contribution of secondary arginine radicals.

Authors:  Mounir Souici; Talat Tariq Khalil; Omar Boulanouar; Abdelfettah Belafrites; Christophe Mavon; Michel Fromm
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Replication of murine mitochondrial DNA following irradiation.

Authors:  Hengshan Zhang; David Maguire; Steven Swarts; Weimin Sun; Shanmin Yang; Wei Wang; Chaomei Liu; Mei Zhang; Di Zhang; Louie Zhang; Kunzhong Zhang; Peter Keng; Lurong Zhang; Paul Okunieff
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  DNA sequence context as a determinant of the quantity and chemistry of guanine oxidation produced by hydroxyl radicals and one-electron oxidants.

Authors:  Yelena Margolin; Vladimir Shafirovich; Nicholas E Geacintov; Michael S DeMott; Peter C Dedon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.