Literature DB >> 18666814

Multiplicity of DNA single-strand breaks produced in pUC18 exposed to the direct effects of ionizing radiation.

Kiran Kumar K Sharma1, Jamie R Milligan, William A Bernhard.   

Abstract

The transition of plasmid DNA from a supercoiled to an open circle conformation, as detected by gel electrophoresis, affords an extraordinarily sensitive method for detecting single-strand breaks (SSBs), one measure of deoxyribose damage. To determine the yield of SSBs, G(ssb), by this method, it is commonly assumed that Poisson statistics apply such that, on average, one SSB occurs per supercoiled plasmid lost. For the direct effect, at a large enough plasmid size, this assumption may be invalid. In this report, the assumption that one SSB occurs per pUC18 plasmid (2686 bp) is tested by measuring free base release (fbr), which is also a measure of deoxyribose damage in films prepared under controlled relative humidity so as to produce known levels of DNA hydration. The level of DNA hydration, Gamma, is expressed in mol water/mol nucleotide. The yield of free base release, G(fbr), was measured by HPLC after exposure of the films to 70 kV X rays and subsequent dissolution in water. It is well known that damage in deoxyribose leads to SSBs and free base release. Based on known mechanisms, there exists a close correspondence between free base release and SSBs, i.e., G(fbr) congruent with G(ssb). Following this assumption, the SSB multiplicity, m(ssb), was determined, where m(ssb) was defined as the mean number of SSBs per supercoiled plasmid lost. The yield of lost supercoil was determined previously (S. Purkayastha et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 26286-26291, 2006). We found that m(ssb) = 1.4 +/- 0.2 at Gamma = 2.5 and m(ssb) = 2.8 +/- 0.5 to 3.1 +/- 0.5 at Gamma = 22.5, indicating that the assumption of one SSB per lost supercoil is not likely to hold for a 2686-bp plasmid exposed to the direct effect. In addition, an increase in G(fbr), upon stepping from Gamma = 2.5 to Gamma = 22.5, was paralleled by an increase in the yield of trapped deoxyribose radicals, G(dRib)(fr), also measured previously. As a consequence, the shortfall between SSBs and trapped radicals, G(diff) = G(ssb) - G(dRib)(fr), remained relatively constant at 90-110 nmol/J. The lack of change between the two extremes of hydration is in keeping with the suggestion that non-radical species, such as doubly oxidized deoxyribose, are responsible for the shortfall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666814      PMCID: PMC2527055          DOI: 10.1667/RR1277.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  29 in total

1.  Clustered damages and total lesions induced in DNA by ionizing radiation: oxidized bases and strand breaks.

Authors:  B M Sutherland; P V Bennett; O Sidorkina; J Laval
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Which DNA damage is likely to be relevant in hormetic responses?

Authors:  William A Bernhard; Shubhadeep Purkayastha; Jamie R Milligan
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  On the experimental distinction between ssbs and dsbs in circular DNA.

Authors:  R Hanai; M Yazu; K Hieda
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  The effect of packing and conformation on free radical yields in films of variably hydrated DNA.

Authors:  M T Milano; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Radiation-induced DNA damage as a function of hydration. II. Base damage from electron-loss centers.

Authors:  S G Swarts; D Becker; M Sevilla; K T Wheeler
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  DNA strand breakage is correlated with unaltered base release after gamma irradiation.

Authors:  E S Henle; R Roots; W R Holley; A Chatterjee
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Yields of OH in gamma-irradiated DNA as a function of DNA hydration: hole transfer in competition with OH formation.

Authors:  T La Vere; D Becker; M D Sevilla
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Effect of hydration on the induction of strand breaks and base lesions in plasmid DNA films by gamma-radiation.

Authors:  Akinari Yokoya; Siobhan M T Cunniffe; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-07-31       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Radiation chemical mechanisms of single- and double-strand break formation in irradiated SV40 DNA.

Authors:  R E Krisch; M B Flick; C N Trumbore
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Variation of single-strand break yield with scavenger concentration for the SV40 minichromosome irradiated in aqueous solution.

Authors:  J R Milligan; J A Aguilera; J F Ward
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  13 in total

1.  Mechanisms of strand break formation in DNA due to the direct effect of ionizing radiation: the dependency of free base release on the length of alternating CG oligodeoxynucleotides.

Authors:  Kiran K Sharma; Yuriy Razskazovskiy; Shubhadeep Purkayastha; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  DNA Condensation with a Boron-Containing Cationic Peptide for Modeling Boron Neutron Capture Therapy.

Authors:  Chris C Perry; Jose Ramos-Méndez; Jamie R Milligan
Journal:  Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.858

3.  What fraction of DNA double-strand breaks produced by the direct effect is accounted for by radical pairs?

Authors:  Anita R Peoples; Kermit R Mercer; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Side-by-side comparison of DNA damage induced by low-energy electrons and high-energy photons with solid TpTpT trinucleotide.

Authors:  Yeunsoo Park; Anita R Peoples; Guru S Madugundu; Léon Sanche; J Richard Wagner
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  One-electron oxidation of DNA by ionizing radiation: competition between base-to-base hole-transfer and hole-trapping.

Authors:  Kiran K K Sharma; Rahul Tyagi; Shubhadeep Purkayastha; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Radioresistance of GGG sequences to prompt strand break formation from direct-type radiation damage.

Authors:  Paul J Black; Adam S Miller; Jeffrey J Hayes
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Characterization of condensed plasmid DNA models for studying the direct effect of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Mandi Tsoi; Trinh T Do; Vicky Tang; Joseph A Aguilera; Christopher C Perry; Jamie R Milligan
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  DNA strand break dependence on Tris and arginine scavenger concentrations under ultra-soft X-ray irradiation: the contribution of secondary arginine radicals.

Authors:  Mounir Souici; Talat Tariq Khalil; Omar Boulanouar; Abdelfettah Belafrites; Christophe Mavon; Michel Fromm
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Kr-86 ion-beam irradiation of hydrated DNA: free radical and unaltered base yields.

Authors:  David Becker; Amitava Adhikary; Smedley T Tetteh; Arthur W Bull; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Induction of DNA damage, including abasic sites, in plasmid DNA by carbon ion and X-ray irradiation.

Authors:  Takuya Shiina; Ritsuko Watanabe; Iyo Shiraishi; Masao Suzuki; Yuki Sugaya; Kentaro Fujii; Akinari Yokoya
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.