Literature DB >> 19492855

Mechanisms of strand break formation in DNA due to the direct effect of ionizing radiation: the dependency of free base release on the length of alternating CG oligodeoxynucleotides.

Kiran K Sharma1, Yuriy Razskazovskiy, Shubhadeep Purkayastha, William A Bernhard.   

Abstract

The question of how NA base sequence influences the yield of DNA strand breaks produced by the direct effect of ionizing radiation was investigated in a series of oligodeoxynucleotides of the form (d(CG)(n))(2) and (d(GC)(n))(2). The yields of free base release from X-irradiated DNA films containing 2.5 waters/nucleotide were measured by HPLC as a function of oligomer length. For (d(CG)(n))(2), the ratio of the Gua yield to Cyt yield, R, was relatively constant at 2.4-2.5 for n = 2-4 and it decreased to 1.2 as n increased from 5 to 10. When Gua was moved to the 5' end, for example going from d(CG)(5) to d(GC)(5), R dropped from 1.9 +/- 0.1 to 1.1 +/- 0.1. These effects are poorly described if the chemistry at the oligomer ends is assumed to be independent of the remainder of the oligomer. A mathematical model incorporating charge transfer through the base stack was derived to explain these effects. In addition, EPR was used to measure the yield of trapped-deoxyribose radicals at 4 K following X-irradiation at 4 K. The yield of free base release was substantially greater, by 50-100 nmol/J, than the yield of trapped-deoxyribose radicals. Therefore, a large fraction of free base release stems from a nonradical intermediate. For this intermediate, a deoxyribose carbocation formed by two one-electron oxidations is proposed. This reaction pathway requires that the hole (electron loss site) transfers through the base stack and, upon encountering a deoxyribose hole, oxidizes that site to form a deoxyribose carbocation. This reaction mechanism provides a consistent way of explaining both the absence of trapped radical intermediates and the unusual dependence of free base release on oligomer length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19492855      PMCID: PMC2791348          DOI: 10.1021/jp900803b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  25 in total

1.  Clustered damages and total lesions induced in DNA by ionizing radiation: oxidized bases and strand breaks.

Authors:  B M Sutherland; P V Bennett; O Sidorkina; J Laval
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  The yield of strand breaks resulting from direct-type effects in crystalline DNA X-irradiated at 4 K and room temperature.

Authors:  M G Debije; Y Razskazovskiy; W A Bernhard
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-03-28       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Strand breaks produced in X-írradiated crystalline DNA: influence of base sequence.

Authors:  Yuriy Razskazovskiy; Michael G Debije; William A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Single, double, and multiple double strand breaks induced in DNA by 3-100 eV electrons.

Authors:  Michael A Huels; Badia Boudaïffa; Pierre Cloutier; Darel Hunting; Leon Sanche
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Radiation-induced DNA damage as a function of hydration. I. Release of unaltered bases.

Authors:  S G Swarts; M D Sevilla; D Becker; C J Tokar; K T Wheeler
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Base release in nucleosides induced by low-energy electrons: a DFT study.

Authors:  Xifeng Li; Léon Sanche; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Photo-induced hole transfer from base to sugar in DNA: relationship to primary radiation damage.

Authors:  Amitava Adhikary; Anil Kumar; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Effect of hydration on the induction of strand breaks and base lesions in plasmid DNA films by gamma-radiation.

Authors:  Akinari Yokoya; Siobhan M T Cunniffe; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-07-31       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Strand breaks in X-irradiated crystalline DNA: alternating CG oligomers.

Authors:  Yuriy Razskazovskiy; Michael G Debije; Shelley B Howerton; Loren D Williams; William A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  C5'- and C3'-sugar radicals produced via photo-excitation of one-electron oxidized adenine in 2'-deoxyadenosine and its derivatives.

Authors:  Amitava Adhikary; David Becker; Sean Collins; Jessica Koppen; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  What fraction of DNA double-strand breaks produced by the direct effect is accounted for by radical pairs?

Authors:  Anita R Peoples; Kermit R Mercer; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Side-by-side comparison of DNA damage induced by low-energy electrons and high-energy photons with solid TpTpT trinucleotide.

Authors:  Yeunsoo Park; Anita R Peoples; Guru S Madugundu; Léon Sanche; J Richard Wagner
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  One-electron oxidation of DNA by ionizing radiation: competition between base-to-base hole-transfer and hole-trapping.

Authors:  Kiran K K Sharma; Rahul Tyagi; Shubhadeep Purkayastha; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Factors affecting the yields of C1' and C5' oxidation products in radiation-damaged DNA: the indirect effect.

Authors:  Charles S Price; Yuriy Razskazovskiy; William A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Mechanisms of direct radiation damage to DNA: the effect of base sequence on base end products.

Authors:  Kiran K K Sharma; Steven G Swarts; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Direct damage to the backbone of DNA oligomers is influenced by the OH moiety at strand ends, by the type of base, and by context.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar K Sharma; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.991

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.