BACKGROUND: Sirolimus is an agent with lymphocyte-specific features similar to those of calcineurin inhibitors but with a different mechanism of action and safety profile. To optimize the use of sirolimus-based immunosuppression, further investigation of appropriate pharmacokinetic (sirolimus exposure) and pharmacodynamic (sirolimus T-cell immunomodulator effect) monitoring is required to determine personalized target concentrations. AIM: The main objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of combined pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring and to apply biomarkers of immunosuppression in stable kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus monotherapy. METHODS: Fourteen renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus monotherapy (median 2 years) were included in this study. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated in each patient three times: at inclusion in the study (day 1), then again at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The median sirolimus concentration was 11.5 ng/mL. CD4+ T-cell adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentrations (150 ng/mL) and interleukin (IL)-10 production (50.9 ng/mL) were significantly lower in treated patients than in healthy controls (n = 95) [301 ng/mL; 278 ng/mL, respectively]. Median inhibition of T-cell proliferation was 60% (31-96%) in treated patients. Interferon-gamma and transforming growth factor-beta production was found to be similar to those in the healthy controls. Our results suggest an association between low ATP and IL-10 concentrations and the presence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential measurement of these biomarkers in stable renal transplant recipients treated with monotherapy could be useful to evaluate the biological effect of sirolimus in each patient and to establish personalized therapy taking into account the individual response to the drug.
BACKGROUND:Sirolimus is an agent with lymphocyte-specific features similar to those of calcineurin inhibitors but with a different mechanism of action and safety profile. To optimize the use of sirolimus-based immunosuppression, further investigation of appropriate pharmacokinetic (sirolimus exposure) and pharmacodynamic (sirolimus T-cell immunomodulator effect) monitoring is required to determine personalized target concentrations. AIM: The main objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of combined pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring and to apply biomarkers of immunosuppression in stable kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus monotherapy. METHODS: Fourteen renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus monotherapy (median 2 years) were included in this study. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated in each patient three times: at inclusion in the study (day 1), then again at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The median sirolimus concentration was 11.5 ng/mL. CD4+ T-cell adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentrations (150 ng/mL) and interleukin (IL)-10 production (50.9 ng/mL) were significantly lower in treated patients than in healthy controls (n = 95) [301 ng/mL; 278 ng/mL, respectively]. Median inhibition of T-cell proliferation was 60% (31-96%) in treated patients. Interferon-gamma and transforming growth factor-beta production was found to be similar to those in the healthy controls. Our results suggest an association between low ATP and IL-10 concentrations and the presence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential measurement of these biomarkers in stable renal transplant recipients treated with monotherapy could be useful to evaluate the biological effect of sirolimus in each patient and to establish personalized therapy taking into account the individual response to the drug.
Authors: Manuel Pascual; Tom Theruvath; Tatsuo Kawai; Nina Tolkoff-Rubin; A Benedict Cosimi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard Kowalski; Diane Post; Mary C Schneider; Judith Britz; Judy Thomas; Mark Deierhoi; Andrew Lobashevsky; Robert Redfield; Eugene Schweitzer; Alonso Heredia; Elise Reardon; Charles Davis; Carol Bentlejewski; John Fung; Ron Shapiro; Adriana Zeevi Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Fritz Diekmann; Alex Gutierrez-Dalmau; José Vicente Torregrosa; Federico Oppenheimer; Josep M Campistol Journal: Transplantation Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Markus J Barten; Frank Streit; Martin Boeger; Stefan Dhein; Attila Tarnok; Maria Shipkova; Victor W Armstrong; Friedrich W Mohr; Michael Oellerich; Jan F Gummert Journal: Transplantation Date: 2004-04-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Helena Colom; Franc Andreu; Teun van Gelder; Dennis A Hesselink; Brenda C M de Winter; Oriol Bestard; Joan Torras; Josep M Cruzado; Josep M Grinyó; Núria Lloberas Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Michelle K Yong; Paul U Cameron; Monica A Slavin; Allen C Cheng; C Orla Morrissey; Krystal Bergin; Andrew Spencer; David Ritchie; Sharon R Lewin Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Padmalatha S Reddy; Holly M Legault; Joseph P Sypek; Mark J Collins; Elizabeth Goad; Samuel J Goldman; Wei Liu; Stuart Murray; Andrew J Dorner; Margot O'Toole Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2008-11-03 Impact factor: 5.156