Literature DB >> 20693454

Interrelations between the microbiotas in the litter and in the intestines of commercial broiler chickens.

Michael D Cressman1, Zhongtang Yu, Michael C Nelson, Steven J Moeller, Michael S Lilburn, Henry N Zerby.   

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens and the microbiota in the litter have been well studied, but the interactions between these two microbiotas remain to be determined. Therefore, we examined their reciprocal effects by analyzing the intestinal microbiotas of broilers reared on fresh pine shavings versus reused litter, as well as the litter microbiota over a 6-week cycle. Composite ileal mucosal and cecal luminal samples from birds (n = 10) reared with both litter conditions (fresh versus reused) were collected at 7, 14, 21, and 42 days of age. Litter samples were also collected at days 7, 14, 21, and 42. The microbiotas were profiled and compared within sample types based on litter condition using PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE). The microbiotas were further analyzed using 16S rRNA gene clone libraries constructed from microbiota DNA extracted from both chick intestinal and litter samples collected at day 7. Results showed significant reciprocal effects between the microbiotas present in the litter and those in the intestines of broilers. Fresh litter had more environmental bacteria, while reused litter contained more bacteria of intestinal origin. Lactobacillus spp. dominated the ileal mucosal microbiota of fresh-litter chicks, while a group of bacteria yet to be classified within Clostridiales dominated in the ileal mucosal microbiota in the reused-litter chicks. The Litter condition (fresh versus reused) seemed to have a more profound impact on the ileal microbiota than on the cecal microbiota. The data suggest that the influence of fresh litter on ileal microbiota decreased as broilers grew, compared with temporal changes observed under reused-litter rearing conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20693454      PMCID: PMC2950482          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00180-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  42 in total

1.  Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  16S rRNA gene-based analysis of mucosa-associated bacterial community and phylogeny in the chicken gastrointestinal tracts: from crops to ceca.

Authors:  Jianhua Gong; Weiduo Si; Robert J Forster; Ruilin Huang; Hai Yu; Yulong Yin; Chengbo Yang; Yanming Han
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Persistence of cellulitis-associated Escherichia coli DNA fingerprints in successive broiler chicken flocks.

Authors:  R S Singer; J S Jeffrey; T E Carpenter; C L Cooke; E R Atwill; W O Johnson; D C Hirsh
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Intestinal function and gut microflora of broiler chickens as influenced by cereal grains and microbial enzyme supplementation.

Authors:  M D Shakouri; P A Iji; L L Mikkelsen; A J Cowieson
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.130

5.  Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples.

Authors:  Zhongtang Yu; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.993

6.  The effect of alum addition on microbial communities in poultry litter.

Authors:  M J Rothrock; K L Cook; J G Warren; K Sistani
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Spatial and temporal variation of the intestinal bacterial community in commercially raised broiler chickens during growth.

Authors:  P W J J van der Wielen; D A Keuzenkamp; L J A Lipman; F van Knapen; S Biesterveld
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  New screening software shows that most recent large 16S rRNA gene clone libraries contain chimeras.

Authors:  Kevin E Ashelford; Nadia A Chuzhanova; John C Fry; Antonia J Jones; Andrew J Weightman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies.

Authors:  Kevin E Ashelford; Nadia A Chuzhanova; John C Fry; Antonia J Jones; Andrew J Weightman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  NAST: a multiple sequence alignment server for comparative analysis of 16S rRNA genes.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; K Keller; E L Brodie; N Larsen; Y M Piceno; R Phan; G L Andersen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  48 in total

1.  A Consistent and Predictable Commercial Broiler Chicken Bacterial Microbiota in Antibiotic-Free Production Displays Strong Correlations with Performance.

Authors:  Timothy J Johnson; Bonnie P Youmans; Sally Noll; Carol Cardona; Nicholas P Evans; T Peter Karnezos; John M Ngunjiri; Michael C Abundo; Chang-Won Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  On-farm Campylobacter and Escherichia coli in commercial broiler chickens: Re-used bedding does not influence Campylobacter emergence and levels across sequential farming cycles.

Authors:  H N Chinivasagam; W Estella; H Rodrigues; D G Mayer; C Weyand; T Tran; A Onysk; I Diallo
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Biodegradation of roxarsone by a bacterial community of underground water and its toxic impact.

Authors:  S Mafla; R Moraga; C G León; V G Guzmán-Fierro; J Yañez; C T Smith; M A Mondaca; V L Campos
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet.

Authors:  Deng Pan; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2013-10-31

5.  Effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation by, and abundance and diversity of, rumen microbial populations.

Authors:  Amlan K Patra; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Longitudinal Changes in Campylobacter and the Litter Microbiome throughout the Broiler Production Cycle.

Authors:  Robert Valeris-Chacin; Bonnie Weber; Timothy J Johnson; Maria Pieters; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 5.005

7.  Litter Commensal Bacteria Can Limit the Horizontal Gene Transfer of Antimicrobial Resistance to Salmonella in Chickens.

Authors:  Adelumola Oladeinde; Zaid Abdo; Benjamin Zwirzitz; Reed Woyda; Steven M Lakin; Maximilian O Press; Nelson A Cox; Jesse C Thomas; Torey Looft; Michael J Rothrock; Gregory Zock; Jodie Plumblee Lawrence; Denice Cudnik; Casey Ritz; Samuel E Aggrey; Ivan Liachko; Jonas R Grove; Crystal Wiersma
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 8.  Bacterial symbioses of the medicinal leech Hirudo verbana.

Authors:  Michael C Nelson; Joerg Graf
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2012-05-10

9.  Dietary Protein Source and Litter Condition Alter Broiler Chicken Intestinal Macrophage and Mitotically Active Cell Populations.

Authors:  A Jacob Keel; Allan J Calderon; Oscar J Tejeda; Jessica D Starkey; Charles W Starkey
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-13

10.  Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences.

Authors:  Dragana Stanley; Mark S Geier; Honglei Chen; Robert J Hughes; Robert J Moore
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.