Literature DB >> 1770365

Mechanical stability of porous-coated acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty.

J B Stiehl1, E MacMillan, D A Skrade.   

Abstract

Five different porous-coated acetabular prosthetic configurations underwent in vitro testing to assess mechanical stability in embalmed cadaver hemipelves: Harris Galante II cup with three cancellous screws, Biomet Universal cup, Whiteside cup with peripheral pegs, Whiteside cup with two cancellous screws, and plain Whiteside cup. Following implantation in a neutral frame, cyclic load testing was done using 33 specimens at 100-kg load for 100,000 cycles using an MTS machine (MTS Systems Corp., Minneapolis, MN). Subsequently, static load-to-failure testing was done in all specimens. Subsidence and micromovement were determined for each specimen using linear variable differential transformers. With cyclic testing, overall cup subsidence revealed a significant increase, from 500 to 100,000 cycles. Overall cup micromovement revealed a significant decrease, and all cup groups demonstrated less than 125 microns (.125 mm) of average mean micromotion at the completion of cyclic testing. The best cup configuration was a 1-mm, oversized, press-fit cup using two 6.5 cancellous screws for additional fixation, which revealed an average mean of 60 microns (.06 mm) of micromovement. Static load testing revealed unacceptable micromovement over 150 microns (.150 mm) in most cups with 300-kg loads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1770365     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80179-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  [Does osteoporosis lead to reduction the primary stability of cementless hip cups?].

Authors:  C von Schulze-Pellengahr; A Bürkner; T Lichtinger; W Teske; A Fottner; B Wegener; T Vogel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Should we worry about periacetabular interference gaps in hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Bruno Gomes; Michael Olsen; Michael Donnelly; Ashesh Kumar; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments.

Authors:  N A Beckmann; R G Bitsch; M Gondan; M Schonhoff; S Jaeger
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  Management of intraoperative acetabular fracture in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Juncheng Li; Quanbo Ji; Ming Ni; Qingyuan Zheng; Jingyang Sun; Guoqiang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Two Different Methods to Measure the Stability of Acetabular Implants: A Comparison Using Artificial Acetabular Models.

Authors:  Quentin Goossens; Leonard Cezar Pastrav; Michiel Mulier; Wim Desmet; Jos Vander Sloten; Kathleen Denis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.