Literature DB >> 12763200

Posture and mental task performance when viewing a moving visual field.

Tanja Ehrenfried1, Michel Guerraz, Kai V Thilo, Lucy Yardley, Michael A Gresty.   

Abstract

We investigated the characteristics of standing posture and performance of concurrent cognitive tasks in subjects confronted by whole field visual motion. Movements of the head and centre of pressure (COP) were recorded in 12 subjects who performed modified Brooks spatial and verbal tasks when in quiet stance viewing a chequerboard pattern, planar, visual field, moving with uniform velocity (25 degrees /s, 50 degrees /s and 76 degrees /s). Eight subjects were also tested seated to control for the effect of stance. Task load was monitored by heart rate and eye movements were recorded to ensure viewing compliance. Subjects rated their quotidian susceptibility to visual disorientation on a validated scale. In both lateral and antero-posterior directions there were small amplitude but significant increases in COP sway path length and standard deviations of both COP and head sway during exposure to visual motion in proportion to visual flow speed. Performing cognitive tasks during visual motion attenuated sway S.D. The effects on sway of task and visual flow were independent. Visual motion induced a slight tilt and turn of the head and body in the direction of flow together with slight neck flexion. Errors on both verbal and spatial tasks increased >250% during visual motion both when standing and when seated. Ratings of subjects' susceptibility to disorientation were un-related to either verbal or spatial task error rates. A current hypothesis is that the enhancement of sway by visual motion is destabilisation. We propose an alternative explanation that sway enhancement could be exploratory 'testing of the ground' movements to check for self motion. Hence decrease in sway magnitude during a cognitive task could be caused by a reduction in exploratory movement because attention is diverted from postural control to a secondary task. Mere passive viewing of a moving visual field may interfere with cognitive tasks possibly because the threat of disorientation by whole field motion diverts attentional resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12763200     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00088-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  18 in total

1.  How performing a mental arithmetic task modify the regulation of centre of foot pressure displacements during bipedal quiet standing.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Hervé Vincent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential integration of kinaesthetic signals to postural control.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of expectation on postural disturbance evoked by proprioceptive stimulation.

Authors:  Sébastien Caudron; Fréderic Boy; Nicolas Forestier; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Changes in the relative contribution of each leg to the control of quiet two-legged stance following unilateral plantar-flexor muscles fatigue.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Matthieu Boisgontier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Differential integration of visual and kinaesthetic signals to upright stance.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Benoît Fourre; Nicolas Vuillerme; Guillaume Giraudet; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Experimental neck muscle pain impairs standing balance in humans.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Nicolas Pinsault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Compensatory manual motor responses while object wielding during combined linear visual and physical roll tilt stimulation.

Authors:  W Geoffrey Wright; Erich Schneider; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Increasing cognitive load with increasing balance challenge: recipe for catastrophe.

Authors:  Julien Barra; Adam Bray; Vishal Sahni; John F Golding; Michael A Gresty
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Does observation of postural imbalance induce a postural reaction?

Authors:  Banty Tia; Arnaud Saimpont; Christos Paizis; France Mourey; Luciano Fadiga; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual reliance for balance control in older adults persists when visual information is disrupted by artificial feedback delays.

Authors:  Ting Ting Yeh; Tyler Cluff; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.