Literature DB >> 17702800

An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.

Simona Tecco1, Donato Di Iorio, Giancarlo Cordasco, Italia Verrocchi, Felice Festa.   

Abstract

This study, performed using a specially designed apparatus that included 10 aligned brackets, evaluated the frictional resistance generated by conventional stainless steel (SS) brackets (Victory Series), self-ligating Damon SL II brackets, Time Plus brackets, and low-friction ligatures (Slide) coupled with various SS, nickel-titanium (NiTi), and beta-titanium (TMA) archwires. All brackets had a 0.022-inch slot and the orthodontic wire alloys were 0.016, 0.016 x 0.022, and 0.019 x 0.025 inch NiTi, 0.017 x 0.025 inch TMA, and 0.019 x 0.025 inch SS. Each bracket-archwire combination was tested 10 times. Coupled with 0.016 inch NiTi, Victory brackets generated the most friction and Damon SL II the least (P < 0.001); with 0.016 x 0.022 inch NiTi, the self-ligating brackets (Time and Damon SL II) generated significantly lower friction (P < 0.001) than Victory Series and Slide ligatures; with 0.019 x 0.025 inch SS or 0.019 x 0.025 inch NiTi, Slide ligatures generated significantly lower friction than all other groups. No difference was observed among the four groups when used with a 0.017 x 0.025-inch TMA archwire. These findings suggest that the use of an in vitro testing model that includes 10 brackets provides information about the frictional force of the various bracket-archwire combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17702800     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Properties, Load Deflection Rate and Surface Characteristics of Different Coloured TMA Archwires - An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Arul Pradeep Aloysius; Devaki Vijayalakshmi; Nagachandran Kandasamy Soundararajan; Vijaykumar Neelam Manohar; Nayeemullah Khan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.

Authors:  Maria Regina Guerra Monteiro; Licinio Esmeraldo da Silva; Carlos Nelson Elias; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Ceramic brackets and low friction : A possible synergy in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning.

Authors:  Matteo Camporesi; Mariana Bulhoes Galvão; André Tortamano; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Nicolò Defraia; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Graziane Olímpio Pereira; Carla Maria Melleiro Gimenez; Lucas Prieto; Marcos Gabriel do Lago Prieto; Roberta Tarkany Basting
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

5.  Active and passive self-ligation: a myth? Part 1: torque control.

Authors:  Lorenz Martin Brauchli; Markus Steineck; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Debris, roughness and friction of stainless steel archwires following clinical use.

Authors:  Isabella Silva Vieira Marques; Adriana M Araújo; Júlio A Gurgel; David Normando
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Comparison of orthodontic space closure using micro-osteoperforation and passive self-ligating appliances or conventional fixed appliances.

Authors:  Rashmi Mittal; Sonal Attri; Puneet Batra; Saurabh Sonar; Karan Sharma; Sreevatsan Raghavan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Comparison of commercially available arch wires with normal dental arch in a group of Iranian population.

Authors:  Zohreh Hedayati; Farnaz Fakhri; Vahid Moshkel Gosha
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-06

9.  Effect of bracket bevel design and oral environmental factors on frictional resistance.

Authors:  Chen-Jung Chang; Tzer-Min Lee; Jia-Kuang Liu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Friction forces during sliding of various brackets for malaligned teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Vito Crincoli; Letizia Perillo; Maria Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Antonio Balsamo; Vitaliano Serpico; Francesco Chiatante; Carmine Pappalettere; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.