Literature DB >> 17701439

Computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: definitive or detrimental?

Sandeepa Musunuru1, Herbert Chen, Layton F Rikkers, Sharon M Weber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with presumed appendicitis was evaluated at a single institution to determine the sensitivity of this diagnostic test and its effect on clinical outcome.
METHODS: Adult patients (age > 17 years) with appendicitis were identified from hospital records. Findings at surgery, including the incidence of perforation, were correlated with imaging results.
RESULTS: During a 3-year period, 411 patients underwent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis at our institution. Of these patients, 256 (62%) underwent preoperative CT, and the remaining 155 (38%) patients did not have imaging before the surgery. The time interval between arrival in the emergency room to time in the operating room was longer for patients who had preoperative imaging (8.2 +/- 0.3 h) compared to those who did not (5.1 +/- 0.2 h, p < 0.001). Moreover, this possible delay in intervention was associated with a higher rate of appendiceal perforation in the CT group (17 versus 8%, p = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CT scanning in patients with presumed appendicitis should be used selectively as widespread utilization may adversely affect outcomes. The potential negative impact of CT imaging includes a delay in operative intervention and a potentially higher perforation rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701439     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0268-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  18 in total

1.  A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient.

Authors:  M D Horton; S F Counter; M G Florence; M J Hart
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: prospective validation.

Authors:  Jared L Antevil; Louis Rivera; Bret J Langenberg; George Hahm; Michael A Favata; Carlos V R Brown
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis?

Authors:  Michael F Ditillo; James D Dziura; Reuven Rabinovici
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Arthur H Aufses; Mary Rojas; Carol Bodian
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S L Lee; A J Walsh; H S Ho
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-05

6.  Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline; A A Mostafavi; C J McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Sam S Torbati; David A Guss
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Implications of removing a normal appendix.

Authors:  C L Bijnen; W T van den Broek; A B Bijnen; P de Ruiter; D J Gouma
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.

Authors:  Sandra E Bendeck; Matilde Nino-Murcia; Gerald J Berry; R Brooke Jeffrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  A prospective randomized study of clinical assessment versus computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  John J Hong; Stephen M Cohn; A Peter Ekeh; Martin Newman; Moises Salama; Suzanne D Leblang
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.150

View more
  6 in total

1.  Can lab data be used to reduce abdominal computed tomography (CT) usage in young adults presenting to the emergency department with nontraumatic abdominal pain?

Authors:  Meir H Scheinfeld; Soham Mahadevia; Evan G Stein; Katherine Freeman; Alla M Rozenblit
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-03-20

2.  Demographic factors associated with length of stay in hospital and histological diagnosis in adults undergoing appendicectomy.

Authors:  Shivam Bhanderi; Quratul Ain; Iram Siddique; Vasileios Charalampakis; Markos Daskalakis; Rajwinder Nijjar; Martin Richardson; Rishi Singhal
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Acute appendicitis in the twenty-first century: should we modify the management protocol?

Authors:  Eran Sadot; Nir Wasserberg; Ron Shapiro; Andrei Keidar; Bernice Oberman; Siegal Sadetzki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Imaging utilization in the management of appendicitis and its impact on hospital charges.

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Sukru Mehmet Erturk; Roberto E Ochoa; Aldo Gonzalez-Beicos; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-10-31

Review 5.  Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults.

Authors:  Jenny Tannoury; Bassam Abboud
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  A rare case of appendiceal tip complete attachment to a sigmoid diverticulum: An appendiceal phlegmon case report.

Authors:  Farzad Vaghef Davari; Arezou Hashem Zadeh
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.