Literature DB >> 17701371

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the cure of fourth-degree hemorrhoids: long-term evaluation and clinical results.

Claudio Mattana1, Claudio Coco, Alberto Manno, Alessandro Verbo, Gianluca Rizzo, Luigi Petito, Daniel Sermoneta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with Milligan-Morgan procedure are discussed.
METHODS: The clinical data of 100 patients treated by Milligan-Morgan procedure or stapled hemorrhoidopexy for fourth-degree hemorrhoids have been reviewed. All patients were visited and submitted to a questionnaire to evaluate resumption of symptoms, functional results, and recurrence rate.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 54 months for stapled hemorrhoidopexy and 92 months for the Milligan-Morgan procedure. Postoperative pain and return to normal activity were worse in the Milligan-Morgan procedure (Visual Analog Scale 8.56 vs. 5.46, P < 0.001; and 2.4 vs. 2 weeks, P value = 0.018). Eight percent of patients who had stapled hemorrhoidopexy complained of spontaneous pain or pain during defecation vs. 0 percent of patients who underwent the Milligan-Morgan procedure. We noted that there was bleeding in 14 percent of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. 0 percent of Milligan-Morgan procedure (P < 0.006), tenesmus in 32 percent of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. 0 percent of Milligan-Morgan procedure (P < 0.001), and pruritus in 4 percent of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. 0 percent of Milligan-Morgan procedure. Minor leakage was similar in the two groups. Flatus impaired control was less frequent in Milligan-Morgan. The relative risk of recurrence for stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with Milligan-Morgan procedure was 1.18 (95 percent confidence interval 1< relative risk < 1.4). No statistical difference was noted in patients' satisfaction after the procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Long follow-up seems to indicate more favorable results in Milligan-Morgan procedure in terms of resumption of symptoms and risk of recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701371     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0294-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  Retained staples causing rectal bleeding and severe proctalgia after the STARR procedure.

Authors:  F Boffi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Rectoanal repair versus suture haemorrhoidopexy: a comparative study on suture mucopexy procedures for high-grade haemorrhoids.

Authors:  G E Theodoropoulos; N V Michalopoulos; D Linardoutsos; P Stamopoulos; I Flessas; D Tsamis; G C Zografos
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Pei-Jing Cui; Hua-Zhong Han; Da-Nian Tong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Liesel J Porrett; Jemma K Porrett; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

5.  Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  S Leardi; B Pessia; M Mascio; F Piccione; M Schietroma; R Pietroletti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Stapled and conventional Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: different solutions for different targets.

Authors:  Alessandra Panarese; Daniele Pironi; Maurizio Vendettuoli; Stefano Pontone; Stefano Arcieri; Andrea Conversi; Anna Maria Romani; Angelo Filippini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Stapled versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Georgia Dedemadi; Arnold Radtke; Ioannis Papanikolaou; Thalis Christofides; Andreas D Rink; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Intraoperative ligation of residual haemorrhoids after stapled mucosectomy.

Authors:  P Garg
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Randomized clinical trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K-Y Tan; T Zin; H-L Sim; P-L Poon; A Cheng; K Mak
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.