Literature DB >> 17700443

Different effects of static versus cyclic compressive loading on rat intervertebral disc height and water loss in vitro.

Kazunori Masuoka1, Arthur J Michalek, Jeffrey J MacLean, Ian A F Stokes, James C Iatridis.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study on rat caudal motion segments to evaluate association between compressive loading and water content under static and cyclic conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To test hypotheses: 1) there is no difference in height loss and fluid (volume) loss of discs loaded in compression under cyclic (0.15-1.0 MPa) and static conditions with the same root-mean-square (RMS) magnitudes (0.575 MPa); and 2) after initial disc bulge, tissue water loss is directly proportional to height loss under static loading. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc degeneration affects water content, elastic and viscoelastic behaviors. There is limited understanding of the association between transient water loss and viscoelastic creep in a controlled in vitro environment where inferences may be made regarding mechanisms of viscoelasticity.
METHODS: A total of 126 caudal motion segments from 21 Wistar rats were tested in compression using 1 of 6 protocols: Static loading at 1.0 MPa for 9, 90, and 900 minutes, Cyclic loading at 0.15 to 1.0 MPa/1 Hz for 90 minutes, Mid-Static loading at 0.575 MPa for 90 minutes, and control. Water content was then measured in anulus and nucleus regions.
RESULTS: Percent water loss was significantly greater in nucleus than anulus regions, suggesting some water redistribution, with average values under 1 MPa static loading of 23.0% and 14.9% after 90 minutes and 26.9% and 17.6% after 900 minutes, respectively. Cyclic loading resulted in significantly greater height loss (0.506 +/- 0.108 mm) than static loading with the same RMS value (0.402 +/- 0.096 mm), but not significantly less than static loading at peak value (0.539 +/- 0.122 mm). Significant and strong correlations were found between percent water loss and disc height loss, suggesting water was lost through volume decrease.
CONCLUSION: Peak magnitude of cyclic compression and not RMS value was most important in determining height change and water loss, likely due to differences between disc creep and recovery rates. Water redistribution from nucleus to anulus occurred under loading consistent with an initial elastic compression (and associated disc bulge) followed by a reduction in disc volume over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17700443      PMCID: PMC2570779          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133d591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Effect of loading rate and hydration on the mechanical properties of the disc.

Authors:  A Race; N D Broom; P Robertson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Intradiscal solid phase displacement as a determinant of the centripetal fluid shift in the loaded intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Y Kusaka; O Uemura; H Aoshiba; Y Seo; Y Hirasawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Effect of frozen storage on the creep behavior of human intervertebral discs.

Authors:  N Dhillon; E C Bass; J C Lotz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  An in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in the volume (and fluid content) of the lumbar intervertebral discs during a simulated diurnal load cycle.

Authors:  J A Malko; W C Hutton; W A Fajman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  IN VIVO MEASUREMENTS OF INTRADISCAL PRESSURE. DISCOMETRY, A METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PRESSURE IN THE LOWER LUMBAR DISCS.

Authors:  A NACHEMSON; J M MORRIS
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Role of endplates in contributing to compression behaviors of motion segments and intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Jeffrey J MacLean; Julia P Owen; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Effects of freezing on the biomechanics of the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  V Gleizes; E Viguier; J M Féron; S Canivet; F Lavaste
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration.

Authors:  J Antoniou; T Steffen; F Nelson; N Winterbottom; A P Hollander; R A Poole; M Aebi; M Alini
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Quantitative analysis of diurnal variation in volume and water content of lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  N Roberts; D Hogg; G H Whitehouse; P Dangerfield
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.414

10.  Effect of test environment on intervertebral disc hydration.

Authors:  D S Pflaster; M H Krag; C C Johnson; L D Haugh; M H Pope
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Penetrating annulus fibrosus injuries affect dynamic compressive behaviors of the intervertebral disc via altered fluid flow: an analytical interpretation.

Authors:  Arthur J Michalek; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Duration-dependent influence of dynamic torsion on the intervertebral disc: an intact disc organ culture study.

Authors:  Samantha C W Chan; Jochen Walser; Stephen J Ferguson; Benjamin Gantenbein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Samantha C W Chan; Stephen J Ferguson; Benjamin Gantenbein-Ritter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Region-media coupling in characterization and modelling of the disc annulus single lamella swelling.

Authors:  Javad Tavakoli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Height and torsional stiffness are most sensitive to annular injury in large animal intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Arthur J Michalek; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Intradiscal pressure depends on recent loading and correlates with disc height and compressive stiffness.

Authors:  Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Albert J van der Veen; Barend J van Royen; Idsart Kingma; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Dose-dependent response of tissue-engineered intervertebral discs to dynamic unconfined compressive loading.

Authors:  Katherine D Hudson; Robert I Mozia; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Needle puncture injury of the rat intervertebral disc affects torsional and compressive biomechanics differently.

Authors:  Arthur J Michalek; Kristin L Funabashi; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Effects of torsion on intervertebral disc gene expression and biomechanics, using a rat tail model.

Authors:  Ana Barbir; Karolyn E Godburn; Arthur J Michalek; Alon Lai; Robert D Monsey; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Effects of enzymatic digestion on compressive properties of rat intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Ana Barbir; Arthur J Michalek; Rosalyn D Abbott; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.