Literature DB >> 17699696

TMS pulses on the frontal eye fields break coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements.

S F W Neggers1, W Huijbers, C M Vrijlandt, B N S Vlaskamp, D J L G Schutter, J L Kenemans.   

Abstract

While preparing a saccadic eye movement, visual processing of the saccade goal is prioritized. Here, we provide evidence that the frontal eye fields (FEFs) are responsible for this coupling between eye movements and shifts of visuospatial attention. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the FEFs 30 ms before a discrimination target was presented at or next to the target of a saccade in preparation. Results showed that the well-known enhancement of discrimination performance on locations to which eye movements are being prepared was diminished by TMS contralateral to eye movement direction. Based on the present and other reports, we propose that saccade preparatory processes in the FEF affect selective visual processing within the visual cortex through feedback projections, in that way coupling saccade preparation and visuospatial attention.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17699696     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00357.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Electrical microstimulation thresholds for behavioral detection and saccades in monkey frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Dona K Murphey; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  FEF-Controlled Alpha Delay Activity Precedes Stimulus-Induced Gamma-Band Activity in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Tzvetan Popov; Sabine Kastner; Ole Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Two action systems in the human brain.

Authors:  Ferdinand Binkofski; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Proactive control of sequential saccades in the human supplementary eye field.

Authors:  K M Sharika; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; Tjerk P Gutteling; Stefan Van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification.

Authors:  Chia-lin Lee; Erica Middleton; Daniel Mirman; Solène Kalénine; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of visuospatial attentional control.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2009-10-29

8.  Human fronto-tectal and fronto-striatal-tectal pathways activate differently during anti-saccades.

Authors:  Antoin D de Weijer; Rene C W Mandl; Iris E C Sommer; Matthijs Vink; Rene S Kahn; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Visual and motor connectivity and the distribution of calcium-binding proteins in macaque frontal eye field: implications for saccade target selection.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Iwona Stepniewska; Erin A Crowder; Melanie W Leslie; Erik E Emeric; Matthew J Nelson; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.856

Review 10.  New approaches to the study of human brain networks underlying spatial attention and related processes.

Authors:  Jon Driver; Felix Blankenburg; Sven Bestmann; Christian C Ruff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.