Literature DB >> 17695425

Prediction of response to definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer using positron emission tomography.

Hiroyuki Kato1, Minoru Fukuchi, Tatsuya Miyazaki, Masanobu Nakajima, Naritaka Tanaka, Takanori Inose, Hitoshi Kimura, Ahmad Faried, Kana Saito, Makoto Sohda, Yasuyuki Fukai, Norihiro Masuda, Ryokuhei Manda, Hitoshi Ojima, Katsuhiko Tsukada, Noboru Oriuchi, Keigo Endo, Tetsuo Nonaka, Mariko Shioya, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Hideyuki Sakurai, Takashi Nakano, Hiroyuki Kuwano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has already proven useful in assessing the extension of esophageal carcinomas, detecting tumor recurrence and monitoring responses to therapy. The current study aims to assess the potential role of FDG-PET in predicting the response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with thoracic esophageal SCC who received definitive CRT between January 2001 and December 2005 underwent PET before and after CRT. The clinical evaluation of the primary tumor response to treatment was classified as either complete response (CR) or non-CR.
RESULTS: All patients had intensive FDG uptake in the primary tumor prior to CRT. The standardized uptake value (SUV) averaged 8.2+/-4.7 before CRT and decreased significantly to 2.8+/-1.8 after CRT (p<0.0001). The SUV before CRT averaged 10.2 in the non-CR group (n=17) and 4.9 in the CR group (n= 10). The SUV after CRT averaged 3.7 in the non-CR group and 1.4 in the CR group. The change in SUV for the CR group was higher than that in the non-CR group (p<0.05). The relationship between clinical features and clinical CR was analyzed using logistic regression analysis which revealed significant correlations between clinical CR and the longitudinal dimension of the tumor (p <0.05), SUV before CRT (p<0.05), SUV after CRT (p<0.01) and tumor classification (p <0.05). If the clinical features before CRT were limited, multivariate analysis revealed that the SUV before CRT was an independent predictor for clinical CR (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: In predicting clinical evaluation of therapy prior to CRT, we suggest that SUV prior to definitive CRT is one of the most reliable predictors of response, along with tumor dimensions and classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17695425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  14 in total

1.  Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Michael Christensen; Jonathan D Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Kevin Crawford; Oleh Haluszka; Jeffrey Tokar; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Alan Maurer; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET image-derived parameters for therapy response prediction in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Olivier Pradier; Catherine Cheze-le Rest
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  The predictive value of treatment response using FDG PET performed on day 21 of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A prospective, multicentre study (RTEP3).

Authors:  Odré Palie; Pierre Michel; Jean-François Ménard; Caroline Rousseau; Emmanuel Rio; Boumédiene Bridji; Ahmed Benyoucef; Marc-Etienne Meyer; Khadija Jalali; Stéphane Bardet; Che Mabubu M'vondo; Pierre Olivier; Guillaume Faure; Emmanuel Itti; Christian Diana; Claire Houzard; Françoise Mornex; Frederic Di Fiore; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Salvage lymphadenectomy for recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Masanobu Nakajima; Yasushi Domeki; Hitoshi Satomura; Masakazu Takahashi; Akira Sugawara; Hiroto Muroi; Kinro Sasaki; Satoru Yamaguchi; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

5.  Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hitoshi Satomura; Masanobu Nakajima; Kinro Sasaki; Satoru Yamaguchi; Yasushi Domeki; Masakazu Takahashi; Hiroto Muroi; Tsukasa Kubo; Maiko Kikuchi; Haruka Otomo; Keisuke Ihara; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-06

6.  Predictive value of clinical and 18F-FDG-PET/CT derived imaging parameters in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lisa Marr; Bernhard Haller; Thomas Pyka; Jan C Peeken; Moritz Jesinghaus; Klemens Scheidhauer; Helmut Friess; Stephanie E Combs; Stefan Münch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Predicting the Response of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma: an In-depth Literature Review.

Authors:  Chang-Juan Tao; Gang Lin; Ya-Ping Xu; Wei-Min Mao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  RUNX3 reverses cisplatin resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via suppression of the protein kinase B pathway.

Authors:  De-Jun Li; Mo Shi; Zhou Wang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 9.  Imaging and cancer: a review.

Authors:  Leonard Fass
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 7.449

Review 10.  Predicting tumour response.

Authors:  Samuel D Kyle; W Phillip Law; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.