Literature DB >> 17693881

Management of periacetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.

Petros J Boscainos1, Catherine F Kellett, Anthony C Maury, David Backstein, Allan E Gross.   

Abstract

The goals of acetabular revision surgery are to restore the anatomy and achieve stable fixation for the new acetabular component. The existing bone stock and the type of defect are determining factors in the surgical decision making. When necessary, and especially in younger patients, attempts should be made to restore the bone stock by grafting. The advent of modern reconstruction options, like the trabecular metal revision system and the cup-cage construct, provide more options in addressing the management of severe defects. Trabecular metal has a porosity similar to bone and provides an environment more favorable to bone graft remodeling than conventional metals. We present an overview of our experience and current approach to acetabular revision. In addition, we report our preliminary results with trabecular metal cups and trabecular metal cup-cage constructs used in conjunction with bone graft for addressing major bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17693881     DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181560c6c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Benjamin Bender; Catelyn Coyle; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Use of internal references for assessing CT density measurements of the pelvis as replacement for use of an external phantom.

Authors:  Martijn F Boomsma; Inge Slouwerhof; Jorn A van Dalen; Mireille A Edens; Dirk Mueller; Julien Milles; Mario Maas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Surface replacement of the hip can result in decreased acetabular bone stock.

Authors:  Michael Tanzer; Dylan Tanzer; Karen Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  CT Lesion Model-Based Structural Allografts: Custom Fabrication and Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Jan Claas Brune; Uwe Hesselbarth; Philipp Seifert; Dimitri Nowack; Rüdiger von Versen; Mark David Smith; Dirk Seifert
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.747

8.  Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors.

Authors:  Fazel A Khan; Peter S Rose; Michiro Yanagisawa; David G Lewallen; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Michael S H Kain; Otmar Hersche; Urs Munzinger; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  L Gaiani; R Bertelli; Massimo Palmonari; G Vicenzi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.