Literature DB >> 1769278

Mammalian sex chromosomes: evolution of organization and function.

J A Graves1, J M Watson.   

Abstract

Comparisons of chromosome size, morphology and gene arrangements between mammals of different species permit us to deduce the genome characteristics of the common ancestor, and to chart the changes that have occurred during the divergence of the two lineages. The more distantly related are the species compared, the more remote the common ancestor whose characteristics can be deduced. This means that, providing there are sufficient similarities to warrant comparison, the more divergent the species compared, the more significant the contribution to our understanding of the organization of an ancestral mammalian genome and the process of mammalian genome evolution. One of the genetic surprises of the last decade was the discovery that, although gross karyotypes of distantly related orders of eutherian mammals (e.g. cat, cow, rabbit, man) have diverged extensively, gene mapping studies reveal the presence of large chromosome segments conserved across at least 60 million years (O'Brien et al. 1988). This finding makes it worthwhile to extend genetic comparisons to the two groups of mammals most distantly related to eutherian mammals--marsupials and monotremes. Here we will review comparisons of the sex chromosomes in these three major groups of extant mammals, and show how they have led us to a new view of the evolution of mammalian sex chromosome organization and function in sex determination and X chromosome inactivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1769278     DOI: 10.1007/bf00357055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  22 in total

1.  Report of the nomenclature committee and the 1989 catalog of mapped genes.

Authors:  P J McAlpine; T B Shows; C Boucheix; L C Stranc; T G Berent; A J Pakstis; R C Douté
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1989

2.  Sex chromosome homology and incomplete, tissue-specific X-inactivation suggest that monotremes represent an intermediate stage of mammalian sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  J M Wrigley; J A Graves
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  The X chromosome of monotremes shares a highly conserved region with the eutherian and marsupial X chromosomes despite the absence of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  J M Watson; J A Spencer; A D Riggs; J A Graves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The androgen receptor gene is located on a highly conserved region of the X chromosomes of marsupial and monotreme as well as eutherian mammals.

Authors:  J A Spencer; J M Watson; D B Lubahn; D R Joseph; F S French; E M Wilson; J A Graves
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Differential expression of steroid sulphatase locus on active and inactive human X chromosome.

Authors:  B R Migeon; L J Shapiro; R A Norum; T Mohandas; J Axelman; R L Dabora
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  G-banding evidence for a conserved complement in the Marsupialia.

Authors:  R Rofe; D Hayman
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1985

7.  Sex chromosome evolution: platypus gene mapping suggests that part of the human X chromosome was originally autosomal.

Authors:  J M Watson; J A Spencer; A D Riggs; J A Graves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Gene mapping in marsupials and monotremes, V. Synteny between hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase and phosphoglycerate kinase in the platypus.

Authors:  J M Watson; J A Graves
Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci       Date:  1988

9.  The mammalian Y chromosome: molecular search for the sex-determining gene--summary and perspectives.

Authors:  I Craig; E Levy; N Fraser
Journal:  Development       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif.

Authors:  A H Sinclair; P Berta; M S Palmer; J R Hawkins; B L Griffiths; M J Smith; J W Foster; A M Frischauf; R Lovell-Badge; P N Goodfellow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  31 in total

1.  Comparative chromosome painting between marsupial orders: relationships with a 2n = 14 ancestral marsupial karyotype.

Authors:  A A De Leo; N Guedelha; R Toder; L Voullaire; M A Ferguson-Smith; P C O'Brien; J A Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Conservation of the rat X chromosome gene order in rodent species.

Authors:  A Kuroiwa; K Tsuchiya; T Watanabe; H Hishigaki; E Takahashi; T Namikawa; Y Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Gene mapping studies confirm the homology between the platypus X and echidna X1 chromosomes and identify a conserved ancestral monotreme X chromosome.

Authors:  J M Watson; A Riggs; J A Graves
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Weird mammals provide insights into the evolution of mammalian sex chromosomes and dosage compensation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Evidence for different origin of sex chromosomes in snakes, birds, and mammals and step-wise differentiation of snake sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Kazumi Matsubara; Hiroshi Tarui; Michihisa Toriba; Kazuhiko Yamada; Chizuko Nishida-Umehara; Kiyokazu Agata; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolution of the avian sex chromosomes from an ancestral pair of autosomes.

Authors:  A K Fridolfsson; H Cheng; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; H C Liu; T Raudsepp; T Woodage; B Chowdhary; J Halverson; H Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The spreading of X inactivation into autosomal material of an x;autosome translocation: evidence for a difference between autosomal and X-chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  W M White; H F Willard; D L Van Dyke; D J Wolff
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Comparative mapping of X chromosomes in vole species of the genus Microtus.

Authors:  T B Nesterova; S M Duthie; N A Mazurok; A A Isaenko; N V Rubtsova; S M Zakian; N Brockdorff
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Co-amplification to tail-to-tail copies of MuRVY and IAPE retroviral genomes on the Mus musculus Y chromosome.

Authors:  J Fennelly; K Harper; S Laval; E Wright; M Plumb
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Expression of genes from the human active and inactive X chromosomes.

Authors:  C J Brown; L Carrel; H F Willard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.