Literature DB >> 17692450

History of safe use as applied to the safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from genetically modified organisms.

A Constable1, D Jonas, A Cockburn, A Davi, G Edwards, P Hepburn, C Herouet-Guicheney, M Knowles, B Moseley, R Oberdörfer, F Samuels.   

Abstract

Very few traditional foods that are consumed have been subjected to systematic toxicological and nutritional assessment, yet because of their long history and customary preparation and use and absence of evidence of harm, they are generally regarded as safe to eat. This 'history of safe use' of traditional foods forms the benchmark for the comparative safety assessment of novel foods, and of foods derived from genetically modified organisms. However, the concept is hard to define, since it relates to an existing body of information which describes the safety profile of a food, rather than a precise checklist of criteria. The term should be regarded as a working concept used to assist the safety assessment of a food product. Important factors in establishing a history of safe use include: the period over which the traditional food has been consumed; the way in which it has been prepared and used and at what intake levels; its composition and the results of animal studies and observations from human exposure. This paper is aimed to assist food safety professionals in the safety evaluation and regulation of novel foods and foods derived from genetically modified organisms, by describing the practical application and use of the concept of 'history of safe use'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17692450     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  14 in total

Review 1.  Safety impact--the risk/benefits of functional foods.

Authors:  Gérard Pascal
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Using problem formulation to clarify the meaning of weight of evidence and biological relevance in environmental risk assessments for genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Karen Holt; Ian Kimber
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  Current risk assessment approaches for environmental and food and feed safety assessment.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Genetically Modified Plants: Nutritious, Sustainable, yet Underrated.

Authors:  Kendal D Hirschi
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations: 15 years past.

Authors:  Lieve Herman; Marianne Chemaly; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Pablo Fernandez; Günter Klein; Luisa Peixe; Miguel Prieto; Amparo Querol; Juan Evaristo Suarez; Ingvar Sundh; Just Vlak; Sandra Correia
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.

Authors:  Catrin Hasselgren; Ernst Ahlberg; Yumi Akahori; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Franck Atienzar; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Ewan D Booth; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Zoryana Cammerer; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Laura Custer; Krista Dobo; Tatyana Doktorova; David Faulkner; Kevin A Ford; Marie C Fortin; Markus Frericks; Samantha E Gad-McDonald; Nichola Gellatly; Helga Gerets; Véronique Gervais; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; James S Harvey; Jedd Hillegass; Masamitsu Honma; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Wen Hsu; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Candice Johnson; Robert Jolly; David Jones; Ray Kemper; Michelle O Kenyon; Naomi L Kruhlak; Sunil A Kulkarni; Klaus Kümmerer; Penny Leavitt; Scott Masten; Scott Miller; Chandrika Moudgal; Wolfgang Muster; Alexandre Paulino; Elena Lo Piparo; Mark Powley; Donald P Quigley; M Vijayaray Reddy; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Benoit Schilter; Ronald D Snyder; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Reinhard Stidl; David T Szabo; Andrew Teasdale; Raymond R Tice; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Anna Vuorinen; Brian A Wall; Pete Watts; Angela T White; Joerg Wichard; Kristine L Witt; Adam Woolley; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Short-term evaluation in growing rats of diet containing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ia12 entomotoxin: nutritional responses and some safety aspects.

Authors:  Luciane Mourão Guimarães; Davi Felipe Farias; Relinda Campos Carvalho Muchagata; Mariana Quezado de Magalhães; Cláudio Cabral Campello; Thales Lima Rocha; Ilka Maria Vasconcelos; Ana Fontenele Urano Carvalho; Fernanda Mulinari; Maria Fátima Grossi-de-Sa
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-31

Review 8.  Suggested improvements for the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants used in foods.

Authors:  Richard E Goodman; Afua O Tetteh
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 9.  Toxicological evaluation of proteins introduced into food crops.

Authors:  Bruce Hammond; John Kough; Corinne Herouet-Guicheney; Joseph M Jez
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 10.  Engineered nanomaterials in food: implications for food safety and consumer health.

Authors:  Alina Martirosyan; Yves-Jacques Schneider
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.