Literature DB >> 31942616

The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations: 15 years past.

Lieve Herman1,2, Marianne Chemaly1,2,3, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli2,4, Pablo Fernandez2,5, Günter Klein2, Luisa Peixe1,2,6, Miguel Prieto2,7, Amparo Querol2,8, Juan Evaristo Suarez2,9, Ingvar Sundh2,10, Just Vlak2,11, Sandra Correia12.   

Abstract

Microorganisms are intentionally added at different stages of the food and feed chain (food or feed additive, novel food or plant protection product) and are subjected to regulation and safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority. Safety evaluation is based on application dossiers for market authorisation to the European Commission. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed in 20032 to provide a harmonised generic safety pre-appraisal of the above microorganisms. Unambiguously defined biological taxonomic units (TUs) are assessed for their body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Identified safety concerns for a certain TU can be, where reasonable in number and not universally present, reflected as 'qualifications.' Strains belonging to TUs having QPS status may benefit of a fast track evaluation. The lowest TU for which the QPS status is granted is the species level for bacteria and yeasts and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes. Based on the current body of knowledge and/or the ambiguous taxonomic position, some TUs, such as filamentous fungi, bacteriophages, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Streptomyces spp. and Oomycetes, are not considered liable for QPS status. © FEMS 2018.

Keywords:  EFSA safety assessment; QPS list; QPS opinion; QPS statement; qualified presumption of safety

Year:  2019        PMID: 31942616      PMCID: PMC6962996          DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fny260s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  3 in total

1.  History of safe use as applied to the safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from genetically modified organisms.

Authors:  A Constable; D Jonas; A Cockburn; A Davi; G Edwards; P Hepburn; C Herouet-Guicheney; M Knowles; B Moseley; R Oberdörfer; F Samuels
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 6.023

2.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors:  Aharon Oren; George M Garrity
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Determining the safety of microbial cultures for consumption by humans and animals.

Authors:  Michael W Pariza; Kevin O Gillies; Sarah F Kraak-Ripple; Gregory Leyer; Amy B Smith
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.271

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.