Literature DB >> 17689786

Factors affecting the impingement angle of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements: a laboratory study.

Peter S Walker1, Gokce Yildirim, Jon Sussman-Fort, Jonathan Roth, Brian White, Gregg R Klein.   

Abstract

Maximum flexion-or impingement angle-is defined as the angle of flexion when the posterior femoral cortex impacts the posterior edge of the tibial insert. We examined the effects of femoral component placement on the femur, the slope angle of the tibial component, the location of the femoral-tibial contact point, and the amount of internal or external rotation. Posterior and proximal femoral placement, a more posterior femoral-tibial contact point, and a more tibial slope all increased maximum flexion, whereas rotation reduced it. A mobile-bearing knee gave results similar to those of the fixed-bearing knee, but there was no loss of flexion in internal or external rotation if the mobile bearing moved with the femur. In the absence of negative factors, a flexion angle of 150 degrees can be reached before impingement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17689786     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee flexion in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xiaojun Shi; Bin Shen; Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Effect of posterior design changes on postoperative flexion angle in cruciate retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Tsuji; Tetsuya Tomita; Hideo Hashimoto; Masakazu Fujii; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Medial Pivot Versus Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis Design in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zihang Xu; Shengyuan Tian; Xiang Zhou; Ya Wei; Changbing Wu; Xianghua Jia; Hong Wang
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Cam impingement of the posterior femoral condyle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Murat Bozkurt; Ramazan Akmese; Nurdan Cay; Çetin Isik; Yenel Gurkan Bilgetekin; Merve Gulbiz Kartal; Osman Tecimel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Femoral and tibial insert downsizing increases the laxity envelope in TKA.

Authors:  John Kyle P Mueller; Fred A Wentorf; Richard E Moore
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effect of sagittal femoral component alignment on biomechanics after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Jin-Ah Lee; Hwa-Yong Lee; Dong-Suk Suh; Hyo-Jeong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  The posterior tibial slope does not influence the flexion angle in posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Susumu Takemura; Tessyu Ikawa; Yohei Ohyama; Mitsunari Kim; Kunio Takaoka; Yukihide Minoda; Yoshinori Kadoya
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.