AIMS: This study evaluates a simple echocardiographic rhythm independent expression of left atrial (LA) function, 'the left atrial function index' (LAFI). BACKGROUND: Quantitation of LA function is challenging and often established parameters including peak A are limited to sinus rhythm (SR). We hypothesized that atrial function could be characterized independent of rhythm by combining analogues of LA volume, reservoir function and LV stroke volume. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) were followed for six months post cardioversion (CV). Thirty-seven age matched healthy subjects were controls. The LAFI = LAEF x LVOT-VTI/LAESVI (LAEF = LA emptying fraction, LAESVI = maximal LA volume indexed to BSA, LVOT-VTI = outflow tract velocity time integral). RESULTS: The LAFI pre-CV in the CAF group was depressed vs controls (0.10 +/- 0.05 vs 0.54 +/- 0.17; P = 0.0001). Post-CV, LAFI was lower in persistent AF than in those restored to SR (AF vs SR: 0.08 +/- 0.03 vs 0.15 +/- 0.08; P = 0.0001), improved progressively in SR and was unchanged when AF persisted. CONCLUSION: The LAFI, a simple, rhythm independent expression of atrial function, appears sensitive to differences between individuals in AF and those restored to SR and justifies clinical and investigative applications.
AIMS: This study evaluates a simple echocardiographic rhythm independent expression of left atrial (LA) function, 'the left atrial function index' (LAFI). BACKGROUND: Quantitation of LA function is challenging and often established parameters including peak A are limited to sinus rhythm (SR). We hypothesized that atrial function could be characterized independent of rhythm by combining analogues of LA volume, reservoir function and LV stroke volume. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) were followed for six months post cardioversion (CV). Thirty-seven age matched healthy subjects were controls. The LAFI = LAEF x LVOT-VTI/LAESVI (LAEF = LA emptying fraction, LAESVI = maximal LA volume indexed to BSA, LVOT-VTI = outflow tract velocity time integral). RESULTS: The LAFI pre-CV in the CAF group was depressed vs controls (0.10 +/- 0.05 vs 0.54 +/- 0.17; P = 0.0001). Post-CV, LAFI was lower in persistent AF than in those restored to SR (AF vs SR: 0.08 +/- 0.03 vs 0.15 +/- 0.08; P = 0.0001), improved progressively in SR and was unchanged when AF persisted. CONCLUSION: The LAFI, a simple, rhythm independent expression of atrial function, appears sensitive to differences between individuals in AF and those restored to SR and justifies clinical and investigative applications.
Authors: Benedict T Costello; Mateen Qadri; Bradley Price; Stavroula Papapostolou; Mark Thompson; James L Hare; Andre La Gerche; Murray Rudman; Andrew J Taylor Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Christine C Welles; Ivy A Ku; Damon M Kwan; Mary A Whooley; Nelson B Schiller; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jeffrey J Goldberger; Rishi Arora; David Green; Philip Greenland; Daniel C Lee; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Michael Markl; Jason Ng; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexis L Beatty; Ivy A Ku; Robert H Christenson; Christopher R DeFilippi; Nelson B Schiller; Mary A Whooley Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 21.873