Literature DB >> 29951729

The ventricular residence time distribution derived from 4D flow particle tracing: a novel marker of myocardial dysfunction.

Benedict T Costello1,2, Mateen Qadri3, Bradley Price3, Stavroula Papapostolou1,2, Mark Thompson3, James L Hare1,2, Andre La Gerche1,2,4, Murray Rudman3, Andrew J Taylor5,6.   

Abstract

4D flow cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging allows visualisation of blood flow in the cardiac chambers and great vessels. Post processing of the flow data allows determination of the residence time distribution (RTD), a novel means of assessing ventricular function, potentially providing additional information beyond ejection fraction. We evaluated the RTD measurement of efficiency of left and right ventricular (LV and RV) blood flow. 16 volunteers and 16 patients with systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) underwent CMR studies including 4D flow. The RTDs were created computationally by seeding virtual 'particles' at the inlet plane in customised post-processing software, moving these particles with the measured blood velocity, recording and counting how many exited per unit of time. The efficiency of ventricular flow was determined from the RTDs based on the time constant (RTDc = - 1/B) of the exponential decay. The RTDc was compared to ejection fraction, T1 mapping and global longitudinal strain (GLS). There was a significant difference between groups in LV RTDc (healthy volunteers 1.2 ± 0.13 vs systolic dysfunction 2.2 ± 0.80, p < 0.001, C-statistic = 1.0) and RV RTDc (1.5 ± 0.15 vs 2.0 ± 0.57, p = 0.013, C-statistic = 0.799). The LV RTDc correlated significantly with LVEF (R = - 0.84, P < 0.001) and the RV RTDc had significant correlation with RVEF (R = - 0.402, p = 0.008). The correlation between LV RTDc and LVEF was similar to GLS and LVEF (0.926, p < 0.001). The ventricular residence time correlates with ejection fraction and can distinguish normal from abnormal systolic function. Further assessment of this method of assessment of chamber function is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D flow; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Dilated cardiomyopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29951729     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1407-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  15 in total

1.  Prediction of all-cause mortality from global longitudinal speckle strain: comparison with ejection fraction and wall motion scoring.

Authors:  Tony Stanton; Rodel Leano; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Prognostic value of cardiac time intervals measured by tissue Doppler imaging M-mode in the general population.

Authors:  Tor Biering-Sørensen; Rasmus Mogelvang; Jan Skov Jensen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Vortex flow during early and late left ventricular filling in normal subjects: quantitative characterization using retrospectively-gated 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and three-dimensional vortex core analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed S M Elbaz; Emmeline E Calkoen; Jos J M Westenberg; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Arno A W Roest; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Relation of frequency and severity of mitral regurgitation to survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure.

Authors:  Benjamin H Trichon; G Michael Felker; Linda K Shaw; Christopher H Cabell; Christopher M O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Semi-automatic quantification of 4D left ventricular blood flow.

Authors:  Jonatan Eriksson; Carl Johan Carlhäll; Petter Dyverfeldt; Jan Engvall; Ann F Bolger; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure.

Authors:  Jeptha P Curtis; Seth I Sokol; Yongfei Wang; Saif S Rathore; Dennis T Ko; Farid Jadbabaie; Edward L Portnay; Stephen J Marshalko; Martha J Radford; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping.

Authors:  Leah Iles; Heinz Pfluger; Arintaya Phrommintikul; Joshi Cherayath; Pelin Aksit; Sandeep N Gupta; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Altered Diastolic Flow Patterns and Kinetic Energy in Subtle Left Ventricular Remodeling and Dysfunction Detected by 4D Flow MRI.

Authors:  Emil Svalbring; Alexandru Fredriksson; Jonatan Eriksson; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers; Ann F Bolger; Jan Engvall; Carl-Johan Carlhäll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comprehensive validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the assessment of myocardial extracellular volume.

Authors:  Christopher A Miller; Josephine H Naish; Paul Bishop; Glyn Coutts; David Clark; Sha Zhao; Simon G Ray; Nizar Yonan; Simon G Williams; Andrew S Flett; James C Moon; Andreas Greiser; Geoffrey J M Parker; Matthias Schmitt
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Extracellular volume fraction mapping in the myocardium, part 1: evaluation of an automated method.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Joel R Wilson; Hui Xue; Martin Ugander; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function Using Four-Dimensional Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiaxing Jason Qin; Ben Indja; Alireza Gholipour; Mustafa Gök; Stuart M Grieve
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-09-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.