PURPOSE: Although left atrial function index is reportedly a possible predictor of hospitalization for heart failure and of stroke irrespective of the presence or not of atrial fibrillation (AF), the effects of catheter ablation on left atrial function index have not yet been reported. METHODS: We performed catheter ablation on 55 patients (age 56.6 ± 9.6 years; 44 men; 30 with paroxysmal and 25 with persistent, long-standing AF) and evaluated them by transthoracic echocardiography preoperatively and 3 monthly for 12-24 months after catheter ablation. We then compared clinical characteristics and echocardiographic variables before catheter ablation between two groups: the 42 subjects with the most recent left atrial function index <30 and the 13 in which it was ≥30. RESULTS: Left atrial function index improved after catheter ablation in both groups, plateauing 6 months after the procedure. Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences in the prevalence of chronic AF and left atrial emptying fraction, diameter, and maximum and minimum volume (prevalence of chronic AF, p < 0.05; others, p < 0.01) between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that only maximum left atrial volume predicts left atrial function index after catheter ablation (p < 0.05). In addition, we used ROC analysis to calculate a cutoff value for LA maximum volume as a good predictor and found that a good cutoff value was 63.5 mL, the sensitivity and specificity being 0.75 and 0.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation improves left atrial function index. However, in patients with left atrial maximum volume of over 63.5 mL on echocardiography, the index did not recover to within the normal range after catheter ablation.
PURPOSE: Although left atrial function index is reportedly a possible predictor of hospitalization for heart failure and of stroke irrespective of the presence or not of atrial fibrillation (AF), the effects of catheter ablation on left atrial function index have not yet been reported. METHODS: We performed catheter ablation on 55 patients (age 56.6 ± 9.6 years; 44 men; 30 with paroxysmal and 25 with persistent, long-standing AF) and evaluated them by transthoracic echocardiography preoperatively and 3 monthly for 12-24 months after catheter ablation. We then compared clinical characteristics and echocardiographic variables before catheter ablation between two groups: the 42 subjects with the most recent left atrial function index <30 and the 13 in which it was ≥30. RESULTS: Left atrial function index improved after catheter ablation in both groups, plateauing 6 months after the procedure. Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences in the prevalence of chronic AF and left atrial emptying fraction, diameter, and maximum and minimum volume (prevalence of chronic AF, p < 0.05; others, p < 0.01) between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that only maximum left atrial volume predicts left atrial function index after catheter ablation (p < 0.05). In addition, we used ROC analysis to calculate a cutoff value for LA maximum volume as a good predictor and found that a good cutoff value was 63.5 mL, the sensitivity and specificity being 0.75 and 0.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation improves left atrial function index. However, in patients with left atrial maximum volume of over 63.5 mL on echocardiography, the index did not recover to within the normal range after catheter ablation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Echocardiography; Left atrial function index; Predictor
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Josep Brugada; Douglas L Packer; Riccardo Cappato; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Pierre Jais; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Bruce D Lindsay; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Andrea Natale; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-04-30 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Atul Verma; Fethi Kilicaslan; James R Adams; Steven Hao; Salwa Beheiry; Stephen Minor; Volkan Ozduran; Samy Claude Elayi; David O Martin; Robert A Schweikert; Walid Saliba; James D Thomas; Mario Garcia; Allan Klein; Andrea Natale Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2006-07
Authors: Jonathan M Wong; Christine C Welles; Farnaz Azarbal; Mary A Whooley; Nelson B Schiller; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Christine C Welles; Ivy A Ku; Damon M Kwan; Mary A Whooley; Nelson B Schiller; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mayank Sardana; Adedotun A Ogunsua; Matthew Spring; Amir Shaikh; Owusu Asamoah; Glenn Stokken; Clifford Browning; Cynthia Ennis; J Kevin Donahue; Lawrence S Rosenthal; Kevin C Floyd; Gerard P Aurigemma; Nisha I Parikh; David D McManus Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Felix Hohendanner; Daniel Messroghli; David Bode; Florian Blaschke; Abdul Parwani; Leif-Hendrik Boldt; Frank R Heinzel Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2018-02-19