Literature DB >> 17689093

A systematic evaluation of chip-based nanoelectrospray parameters for rapid identification of proteins from a complex mixture.

Ana Gabriela Pereira-Medrano1, Alistair Sterling, Ambrosius P L Snijders, Kenneth F Reardon, Phillip C Wright.   

Abstract

HPLC-MS/MS is widely used for protein identification from gel spots and shotgun fractions. Although HPLC has well recognized benefits, this type of sample infusion also has some undesirable attributes: relatively low sample throughput, potential sample-to-sample carryover, time-varying sample composition, and no option for longer sample infusion for longer MS analyses. An automated chip-based ESI device (CB-ESI) has the potential to overcome these limitations. This report describes a systematic evaluation of the information-dependant acquisition (IDA) and sample preparation protocols for rapid protein identification from a complex mixture using a CB-ESI source compared with HPLC-ESI (gradient and isocratic elutions). Cytochrome c and a six-protein mixture (11-117 kDa) were used to develop an IDA protocol for rapid protein identification and to evaluate the effects of sample preparation protocols. MS (1-10 s) and MS/MS (1-60 s) scan times, sample concentration (50-500 fmol/microL), and ZipTipC(18) cleanup were evaluated. Based on MOWSE scores, protein coverage, experimental run time, number of identified proteins, and reproducibility, a 12.5 min experiment (22 cycles, each with one 3 s MS and eight 10 s MS/MS scans) was determined to be the optimal IDA protocol for CB-ESI. This work flow yielded up to 220% greater peptide coverage compared with gradient HPLC-ESI and provided protein identifications with up to a 2-fold higher throughput rate than either HPLC-ESI approach, whilst employing half the amount of sample over the same time frame. The results from this study support the use of CB-ESI as a rapid alternative to the identification of protein mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17689093     DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  42 in total

1.  Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?

Authors:  Andrea Schmidt; Michael Karas; Thomas Dülcks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Methods for fractionation, separation and profiling of proteins and peptides.

Authors:  Haleem J Issaq; Thomas P Conrads; George M Janini; Timothy D Veenstra
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Integrating micromachined devices with modern mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Patrick A Limbach; Zhaojing Meng
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  Identification and characterization of the Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 proteome.

Authors:  Poh Kuan Chong; Phillip C Wright
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Proteome analysis of Escherichia coli using high-performance liquid chromatography and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Christian Ihling; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Chip-based quantitative capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry determination of drugs in human plasma.

Authors:  Y Deng; H Zhang; J Henion
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Femtomole sequencing of proteins from polyacrylamide gels by nano-electrospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M Wilm; A Shevchenko; T Houthaeve; S Breit; L Schweigerer; T Fotsis; M Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags.

Authors:  M Mann; M Wilm
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Comparison of protein and peptide prefractionation methods for the shotgun proteomic analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.

Authors:  Chee Sian Gan; Kenneth F Reardon; Phillip C Wright
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Validating regulatory-compliant wide dynamic range bioanalytical assays using chip-based nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Bradley L Ackermann; Ajai K Chaudhary
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automated electrospray ionization FT-ICR mass spectrometry for petroleum analysis.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim; Ryan P Rodgers; Greg T Blakney; Christopher L Hendrickson; Alan G Marshall
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Rapid Targeted Quantitation of Protein Overexpression with Direct Infusion Shotgun Proteome Analysis (DISPA-PRM).

Authors:  Edna A Trujillo; Alexander S Hebert; Julio C Rivera Vazquez; Dain R Brademan; Mehmet Tatli; Daniel Amador-Noguez; Jesse G Meyer; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Advances in structure elucidation of small molecules using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Bioanal Rev       Date:  2010-08-21

4.  Multi-Segment Direct Inject nano-ESI-LTQ-FT-ICR-MS/MS For Protein Identification.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Lorena Canales; Rachel E Neal
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Quantitative shotgun proteome analysis by direct infusion.

Authors:  Jesse G Meyer; Natalie M Niemi; David J Pagliarini; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 28.547

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.