Literature DB >> 17688513

ROC graphs for assessing the ability of a diagnostic marker to detect three disease classes with an umbrella ordering.

Christos T Nakas1, Todd A Alonzo.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under these curves are commonly used to assess the ability of a continuous diagnostic marker (e.g., DNA methylation markers) to correctly classify subjects as having a particular disease or not (e.g., cancer). These approaches, however, are not applicable to settings where the gold standard yields more than two disease states or classes. ROC surfaces and the volume under the surfaces have been proposed for settings with more than two disease classes. These approaches, however, do not allow one to assess the ability of a marker to differentiate two disease classes from a third disease class without requiring a monotone order for the three disease classes under study. That is, existing approaches do not accommodate an umbrella ordering of disease classes. This article proposes the construction of an ROC graph that is applicable for an umbrella ordering. Furthermore, this article proposes that a summary measure for this umbrella ROC graph can be used to summarize the classification accuracy, and corresponding variance estimates can be obtained using U-statistics theory or bootstrap methods. The proposed methods are illustrated using data from a study assessing the ability of a DNA methylation marker to correctly classify lung specimens into three histologic classes: squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and nontumor lung.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17688513     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00715.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ordered symptom statuses without a gold standard.

Authors:  Zheyu Wang; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Miqu Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Yvonne Vergouwe; Caspar W N Looman; Vanya Van Belle; Dirk Timmerman; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Accuracy and cut-off point selection in three-class classification problems using a generalization of the Youden index.

Authors:  Christos T Nakas; Todd A Alonzo; Constantin T Yiannoutsos
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong; Chin-Ying Lai; Albert Vexler
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  The performance of hemoglobin A1c against fasting plasma glucose and oral glucose tolerance test in detecting prediabetes and diabetes.

Authors:  Jale Karakaya; Safak Akin; Ergun Karagaoglu; Alper Gurlek
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Identification of a panel of sensitive and specific DNA methylation markers for squamous cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul P Anglim; Janice S Galler; Michael N Koss; Jeffrey A Hagen; Sally Turla; Mihaela Campan; Daniel J Weisenberger; Peter W Laird; Kimberly D Siegmund; Ite A Laird-Offringa
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 27.401

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.