Literature DB >> 17688183

Maintenance of responding when reinforcement becomes delayed.

Daniel S J Costa1, Robert A Boakes.   

Abstract

In four experiments with rats, we examined the persistence of behavior when reinforcement was switched from immediate to delayed. In Experiment 1, lever pressing elicited by instrumental training with immediate reinforcement continued when a 20-sec delay of reinforcement was introduced (easy-to-hard condition), whereas when the delay condition was introduced from the start (hard-to-hard condition), responding remained low throughout. A similar result was obtained in Experiment 2, in which lever pressing was elicited by a classical conditioning (autoshaping) procedure. In Experiment 3, rats initially trained with delayed reinforcement continued to respond at a low rate when switched to immediate reinforcement (hard-to-easy condition). By measuring magazine entry (goal tracking) as well as lever pressing (sign tracking) in Experiment 4, we confirmed that such transfer effects at least partly involve the persistence of whatever type of behavior was initially dominant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17688183     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  18 in total

1.  Behavioral momentum and the law of effect.

Authors:  J A Nevin; R C Grace
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Learned irrelevance: a contemporary overview.

Authors:  Charlotte Bonardi; Siaw Yann Ong
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-02

3.  Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  W F PROKASY; H C EBEL; D D THOMPSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-08

4.  The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum.

Authors:  D H LAWRENCE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1952-12

5.  The easy to hard effect and perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning.

Authors:  V L Scahill; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-04

6.  Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.

Authors:  M Stiers; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Shaping by automated tracking of an arbitrary operant response.

Authors:  J J Pear; J A Legris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The role of delay of reinforcement in determining reaction potential.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-06

9.  Associative competition in operant conditioning: blocking the response-reinforcer association.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

10.  Delaying reinforcement in an autoshaping task generates adjunctive and superstitious behaviors.

Authors:  R B Messing; M S Kleven; S B Sparber
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 2.  Adjunctive behaviors are operants.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Ricardo Pellón
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Role of prefrontal 5-HT in the strain-dependent variation in sign-tracking behavior of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice.

Authors:  P Campus; A Accoto; M Maiolati; C Latagliata; C Orsini
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The form of a conditioned stimulus can influence the degree to which it acquires incentive motivational properties.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Elizabeth S Cogan; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The hot 'n' cold of cue-induced drug relapse.

Authors:  Kyle K Pitchers; Martin Sarter; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.