Literature DB >> 17682825

Does "clinical" R0 have validity in the choice of simple cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma?

Chang Moo Kang1, Woo Jung Lee, Gi Hong Choi, Jun Young Kim, Kyung Sik Kim, Jin Sub Choi, Byong Ro Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients undergoing simple cholecystectomy and to investigate which patients would benefit from cholecystectomy alone in treating gallbladder carcinoma.
METHODS: The available medical records of patients who underwent cholecystectomy alone for gallbladder carcinomas from August 1992 to February 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Cancer stages were evaluated by clinical meaning based on the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edition. "Clinical" R0, defined as gallbladder confined tumor (pT1-3 with negative resection margin) with cN0 and cM0, was tentatively established to evaluate the quality of simple cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients underwent cholecystectomy alone for gallbladder carcinomas. Twenty-eight patients were male, and forty-seven patients were female, with their mean age 63.5 years (range, 29-80 years). Forty-one patients (54.7%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thirty-four patients (45.3%) underwent open cholecystectomy. T3 lesions were most common (26 patients), followed by T1 (24 patients), T2 (19 patients), and T4 (6 patients). "Clinical R0" could be defined in 48 patients (63%) after simple cholecystectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that incidental gallbladder carcinoma, T stage, and clinical R0 status were independent prognostic factors of long-term survival. When comparing survival outcomes of clinical R0 according to the T stage, no patients with Tis, T1a, and T1b had cancer-related mortality during follow-up. Especially, in patients with T2 gallbladder carcinomas, the mean survival rate was 68.9 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 77.8%. On the contrary, those with T3 lesions had poor prognoses.
CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy alone could be proper management for well-selected patients with gallbladder carcinomas (incidental gallbladder carcinoma, gallbladder confined carcinoma, clinical R0). More experiences and a proper prospective study must be performed to confirm the meaning of clinical R0 in treating gallbladder carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17682825     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0225-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  14 in total

1.  Treatment of T2 gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Yuman Fong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  T Azuma; T Yoshikawa; T Araida; K Takasaki
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Sanjeev Misra; Arun Chaturvedi; Naresh C Misra; Indra D Sharma
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Treatment of gallbladder cancer by radical resection.

Authors:  T Todoroki; T Kawamoto; H Takahashi; Y Takada; N Koike; M Otsuka; K Fukao
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Curative resection in potentially resectable tumours of the gallbladder.

Authors:  X A de Aretxabala; I S Roa; L A Burgos; J C Araya; M A Villaseca; J A Silva
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1997-06

6.  Inapparent carcinoma of the gallbladder. An appraisal of a radical second operation after simple cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Y Shirai; K Yoshida; K Tsukada; T Muto
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma with color Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  N Ueno; T Tomiyama; S Tano; S Wada; K Kimura
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Primary carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  J M Piehler; R W Crichlow
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1978-12

9.  Impact of recent advances in hepatobiliary imaging techniques on the preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  K Chijiiwa; K Sumiyoshi; F Nakayama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Appraisal of surgical treatment for pT2 gallbladder carcinomas.

Authors:  Shohachi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Yokoi; Kiyotaka Kurachi; Keisuke Inaba; Shigeyasu Ota; Masaki Azuma; Hiroyuki Konno; Satoshi Baba; Satoshi Nakamura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  16 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Lymphatic invasion: an important prognostic factor for stages T1b-T3 gallbladder cancer and an indication for additional radical resection of incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Kohei Shibata; Hiroki Uchida; Kentaro Iwaki; Seiichiro Kai; Masayuki Ohta; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Role of cholecystectomy and lymph node dissection in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Kim; Sung Hoon Kim; Gi Hong Choi; Chang Moo Kang; Kyung Sik Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Surgical treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer discovered during or following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yuan-Hu Tian; Xu Ji; Bo Liu; Guang-Yun Yang; Xiang-Fei Meng; Hong-Tian Xia; Jing Wang; Zhi-Qiang Huang; Jia-Hong Dong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Comparison of the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC TNM classification for gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Tak Geun Oh; Moon Jae Chung; Seungmin Bang; Seung Woo Park; Jae Bok Chung; Si Young Song; Gi Hong Choi; Kyung Sik Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Jeong Youp Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The prognostic impact of positive lymph nodes in stages T1 to T3 incidental gallbladder carcinoma: results of the German Registry.

Authors:  Thorsten Oliver Goetze; Vittorio Paolucci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Systematic review on the surgical treatment for T1 gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Seung Eun Lee; Jin-Young Jang; Chang-Sup Lim; Mee Joo Kang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The optimal surgical resection approach for T2 gallbladder carcinoma: evaluating the role of surgical extent according to the tumor location.

Authors:  Tae Jun Park; Keun Soo Ahn; Yong Hoon Kim; Tae-Seok Kim; Jung Hee Hong; Koo Jeong Kang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in pT1-T3 gallbladder adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dana A Dominguez; John G Aversa; Brendan L Hagerty; Laurence P Diggs; Mustafa Raoof; Jeremy L Davis; Jonathan M Hernandez; Andrew M Blakely
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.885

10.  Effects of Surgical Methods and Tumor Location on Survival and Recurrence Patterns after Curative Resection in Patients with T2 Gallbladder Cancer.

Authors:  Woohyun Jung; Jin-Young Jang; Mee Joo Kang; Ye Rim Chang; Yong Chan Shin; Jihoon Chang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.