Literature DB >> 17678990

Treatment selection and outcomes: renal calculi.

C Charles Wen1, Stephen Y Nakada.   

Abstract

This article summarizes the history of how renal stones have been treated over the centuries and reviews current treatments and outcomes for renal stones. The authors provide an algorithm based on available outcome data for shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17678990     DOI： 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN： 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  35 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  [Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvic stones larger than 2.5 cm].

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Jiu-Min Liu; Xue-Cheng Bi; Dong Li; Shang Huang; Yan-Hua Feng; Chu-Qi Lin
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-02-20

3.  Coronal reconstruction of unenhanced abdominal CT for correct ureteral stone size classification.

Authors:  Nadav Berkovitz; Natalia Simanovsky; Ran Katz; Shaden Salama; Nurith Hiller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Is tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy a feasible technique for the treatment of staghorn calculi?

Authors:  Sang Cheol Lee; Chang Hee Kim; Kwang Taek Kim; Tae Beom Kim; Khae Hawn Kim; Han Jung; Sang Jin Yoon; Jin Kyu Oh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-10-15

5.  Efficacy of percutaneous nephrostomy during flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone management.

Authors:  Se Yun Kwon; Bum Soo Kim; Hyun Tae Kim; Yoon Kyu Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-10-15

6.  Prospective randomized comparison between superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access in PCNL for inferior calyceal stones with or without pelvic stones.

Authors:  Vishwajeet Singh; Yogesh Garg; Kuldeep Sharma; Rahul Janak Sinha; Saurabh Gupta
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  A low or high BMI is a risk factor for renal hematoma after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones.

Authors:  Fabio Nussberger; Beat Roth; Tobias Metzger; Bernhard Kiss; George N Thalmann; Roland Seiler
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Comparative study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Yasser M Haggag; Gamal Morsy; Magdy M Badr; Abdel Baset A Al Emam; Mourad Farid; Mohamed Etafy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm.

Authors:  Mustafa Kirac; Ömer Faruk Bozkurt; Lutfi Tunc; Cagri Guneri; Ali Unsal; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter.

Authors:  Hemendra Navinchandra Shah
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.