Literature DB >> 17674146

Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis.

Frédéric Baudat1, Bernard de Massy.   

Abstract

During meiosis the programmed induction of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSB) leads to crossover (CO) and non-crossover products (NCO). One key role of CO is to connect homologs before metaphase I and thus to ensure the proper reductional segregation. This role implies an accurate regulation of CO frequency with the establishment of at least one CO per chromosome arm. Current major challenges are to understand how CO and NCO formation are regulated and what is the role of NCO. We present here the current knowledge about CO and NCO and their regulation in mammals. CO density varies widely along chromosomes and their distribution is not random as they are subject to positive interference. As documented in the mouse and human, a significant excess of DSB are generated relative to the number of CO. In fact, evidence has been obtained for the formation of NCO products, for regulation of the choice of DSB repair towards CO or NCO and for a CO specific pathway. We discuss the roles of Msh4, Msh5 and Sycp1 which affect DSB repair and probably not only the CO pathway. We suggest that, in mammals, the regulation of NCO differs from that described in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17674146     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1140-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  94 in total

1.  Mre11 and Ku70 interact in somatic cells, but are differentially expressed in early meiosis.

Authors:  W Goedecke; M Eijpe; H H Offenberg; M van Aalderen; C Heyting
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  N Hunter; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Distribution of meiotic recombination sites.

Authors:  Bernard de Massy
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Synaptonemal complex formation: where does it start?

Authors:  Kiersten A Henderson; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Near-human aneuploidy levels in female mice with homeologous chromosomes.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Stefanie E Schrump; Jonathan P Cherry; Terry J Hassold; Patricia A Hunt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Cloning and expression analysis of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog: the human MSH4 gene.

Authors:  V Paquis-Flucklinger; S Santucci-Darmanin; R Paul; A Saunières; C Turc-Carel; C Desnuelle
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  Involvement of mammalian Mus81 in genome integrity and tumor suppression.

Authors:  John Peter McPherson; Bénédicte Lemmers; Richard Chahwan; Ashwin Pamidi; Eva Migon; Elzbieta Matysiak-Zablocki; Mary Ellen Moynahan; Jeroen Essers; Katsuhiro Hanada; Anuradha Poonepalli; Otto Sanchez-Sweatman; Rama Khokha; Roland Kanaar; Maria Jasin; M Prakash Hande; Razqallah Hakem
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination.

Authors:  Peter B Moens; Nadine K Kolas; Madalena Tarsounas; Edyta Marcon; Paula E Cohen; Barbara Spyropoulos
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Allelic recombination and de novo deletions in sperm in the human beta-globin gene region.

Authors:  Kim Holloway; Victoria E Lawson; Alec J Jeffreys
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes.

Authors:  M Tarsounas; T Morita; R E Pearlman; P B Moens
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10-18       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  101 in total

1.  DNA recombination. Recombination initiation maps of individual human genomes.

Authors:  Florencia Pratto; Kevin Brick; Pavel Khil; Fatima Smagulova; Galina V Petukhova; R Daniel Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number.

Authors:  Simona Rosu; Diana E Libuda; Anne M Villeneuve
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evolutionary conservation of meiotic DSB proteins: more than just Spo11.

Authors:  Francesca Cole; Scott Keeney; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Recombination patterns in maize reveal limits to crossover homeostasis.

Authors:  Gaganpreet K Sidhu; Celestia Fang; Mischa A Olson; Matthieu Falque; Olivier C Martin; Wojciech P Pawlowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Moynahan; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Relationship between incomplete synapsis and chiasma localization.

Authors:  Alberto Viera; Juan Luis Santos; Julio S Rufas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Hot regions of noninterfering crossovers coexist with a nonuniformly interfering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Sayantani Basu-Roy; Franck Gauthier; Laurène Giraut; Christine Mézard; Matthieu Falque; Olivier C Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Clamping down on mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Amy M Lyndaker; Ana Vasileva; Debra J Wolgemuth; Robert S Weiss; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  MRN and the race to the break.

Authors:  Agnieszka Rupnik; Noel F Lowndes; Muriel Grenon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Colocalization of somatic and meiotic double strand breaks near the Myc oncogene on mouse chromosome 15.

Authors:  Siemon H Ng; Sarah A Maas; Petko M Petkov; Kevin D Mills; Kenneth Paigen
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.