Literature DB >> 19238420

Relationship between incomplete synapsis and chiasma localization.

Alberto Viera1, Juan Luis Santos, Julio S Rufas.   

Abstract

One of the subjects within the meiotic field that has been actively investigated in the recent years is the temporal and functional relationships between meiotic recombination, cohesin loading and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly. Although the study of meiotic mutants has shed some light, many questions remain to be answered. Here, we have studied this topic in the orthopteran Paratettix meridionalis, a species with telocentric chromosomes, which shows two unusual cytological features: pairing and synapsis of homologues during prophase I are restricted to the non-centromeric distal regions and extremely distal chiasma localization in metaphase I bivalents. In order to determine whether there is a relationship between both phenomena, we have used: (1) a spreading technique for following the ultrastructure of SC assembly and (2) immunofluorescence for SMC3 and SMC1alpha cohesin subunits, which mark the development of the axial element (a SC component); the histone gamma-H2AX, which mostly labels the sites of double-strand breaks; and the recombinase RAD51. Spermatocytes showed conspicuous polarization of both the maturation of cohesin axes and the initiation of meiotic recombination events. Consequently, it is proposed that maturation of cohesin axes, which begins in very distal regions, could drive the latter loading of recombinases to such regions. This restricted distribution of recombination events along homologues would finally be responsible for the incomplete pairing and synapsis observed in all autosomes of the complement and hence for chiasma localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19238420     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-009-0204-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  57 in total

Review 1.  Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function.

Authors:  D Zickler; N Kleckner
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Localization and roles of Ski8p protein in Sordaria meiosis and delineation of three mechanistically distinct steps of meiotic homolog juxtaposition.

Authors:  Sophie Tessé; Aurora Storlazzi; Nancy Kleckner; Silvana Gargano; Denise Zickler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  X and B chromosomes display similar meiotic characteristics in male grasshoppers.

Authors:  A Viera; A Calvente; J Page; M T Parra; R Gómez; J A Suja; J S Rufas; J L Santos
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Synaptonemal complex formation: where does it start?

Authors:  Kiersten A Henderson; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis.

Authors:  P J Romanienko; R D Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Light and electron microscope studies of chromosome pairing in relation to chiasma localisation in Stethophyma grossum (Orthoptera: Acrididae).

Authors:  G H Jones
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Arkady Celeste; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Michael J Kruhlak; Duane R Pilch; David W Staudt; Alicia Lee; Robert F Bonner; William M Bonner; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  The Arabidopsis AtRAD51 gene is dispensable for vegetative development but required for meiosis.

Authors:  Wuxing Li; Changbin Chen; Ullrich Markmann-Mulisch; Ljudmilla Timofejeva; Elmon Schmelzer; Hong Ma; Bernd Reiss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis.

Authors:  D K Bishop
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-12-16       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Phosphorylation of histone H2B at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; C David Allis; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cohesin axis maturation and presence of RAD51 during first meiotic prophase in a true bug.

Authors:  Alberto Viera; Juan Luis Santos; María Teresa Parra; Adela Calvente; Rocío Gómez; Roberto de la Fuente; José Angel Suja; Jesús Page; Julio S Rufas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  The template choice decision in meiosis: is the sister important?

Authors:  Mónica Pradillo; Juan L Santos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  A few of our favorite things: Pairing, the bouquet, crossover interference and evolution of meiosis.

Authors:  Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Transcription reactivation during the first meiotic prophase in bugs is not dependent on synapsis.

Authors:  Alberto Viera; María Teresa Parra; Julio S Rufas; Jesús Page
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Dynamics of cohesin subunits in grasshopper meiotic divisions.

Authors:  A Calvente; A Viera; M T Parra; R de la Fuente; J A Suja; J Page; J L Santos; C García de la Vega; J L Barbero; J S Rufas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Spatiotemporal asymmetry of the meiotic program underlies the predominantly distal distribution of meiotic crossovers in barley.

Authors:  James D Higgins; Ruth M Perry; Abdellah Barakate; Luke Ramsay; Robbie Waugh; Claire Halpin; Susan J Armstrong; F Chris H Franklin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Sex differences in the meiotic behavior of an XX sex chromosome pair in males and females of the mole vole Ellobius tancrei: turning an X into a Y chromosome?

Authors:  Ana Gil-Fernández; Sergey Matveevsky; Marta Martín-Ruiz; Marta Ribagorda; María Teresa Parra; Alberto Viera; Julio S Rufas; Oxana Kolomiets; Irina Bakloushinskaya; Jesús Page
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Micro-evolution in grasshoppers mediated by polymorphic Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Pablo C Colombo
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Do Exogenous DNA Double-Strand Breaks Change Incomplete Synapsis and Chiasma Localization in the Grasshopper Stethophyma grossum?

Authors:  Adela Calvente; Juan Luis Santos; Julio S Rufas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Karyotype diversity and chromosomal organization of repetitive DNA in Tityus obscurus (Scorpiones, Buthidae).

Authors:  Bruno Rafael Ribeiro de Almeida; Susana Suely Rodrigues Milhomem-Paixão; Renata Coelho Rodrigues Noronha; Cleusa Yoshiko Nagamachi; Marlyson Jeremias Rodrigues da Costa; Pedro Pereira de Oliveira Pardal; Johne Souza Coelho; Julio Cesar Pieczarka
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.